Sloganeering.Org
home | archive | about | site policies | contact us | s.o store

Archive for December, 2006

OUR YEAR IN BOOKS, PART 3

Sunday, December 31st, 2006

See also part 1 and part 2.

Butterfly Stories, by William T. Vollmann:
The only Vollmann book I’ve read, so far. Disjointed and kind of dark, it’s written in the voice of someone with severe emotional trauma in his background. Sad, and not subtle, but it works.

The Satanic Verses, by Salman Rushdie:
I temporarily forgot that I read this book earlier this year, but just seeing the title again was enough to launch a bunch of psychedelic imagery rattling around my head. I wasn’t always sure exactly what was going on, but in a good way. Unlike the protagonists of the book, my identity has never been at stake (except when I was a teenager, when everybody goes through that). On the “to read” list for a while, again, to see what the fuss was about.

Portnoy’s Complaint, by Philip Roth:
I read of famous, older books this year, I guess. I’m no prude, but I felt a little uncomfortable reading this book on the train every morning. Two people at work asked me if this was, “the book about jerking off.” Yeah, it was a classy place. What can I say about the book that hasn’t been said already?

The System of the World, by Neal Stephenson:
Book Three of the Baroque Cycle. It was a good book, and ended the series nicely. After a thousand pages, I was ready to sign up for whatever book Stephenson plans on selling next.

The Blunder Book, by M Hirsh Goldberg:
Picked this one up at a Friends of the Library sale. It’s a compilation of some of the greatest mistakes in history, and not as interesting as I thought it would be. Pick up The Experts Speak instead, if you can find it.

Issac Newton, by James Gleick:
After reading the Baroque Cycle, I thought it would be fun to read up on the actual Issac Newton, and this book was mercifully short. Consequently, it didn’t tell me very much.

| December 31st, 2006 | by BC | Categories: Miscellaneous | Trackback | No Comments »



ATTENTION SPAN… FADING

Saturday, December 30th, 2006

Yes, I’m the guy.

Whenever TNT or TBS or USA (or any cable network that long ago lost its guiding philosophy and became the same as all the other UHF-level basic cable stations), shows the same movie ten times in one weekend people ask, why? Why are they showing a movie that everybody has either seen in the theater, on DVD, or HBO? Has anybody not seen The Matrix Reloaded by now?
Yes. I’m the guy.

I hate going to the theater. As an experience, it’s really got nothing to offer me: my legs are too short to kick the seat in front of me with any kind of satisfying force; my voice is too weak and reedy to really obscure plot-critical sections of dialog; my cell phone doesn’t get a good signal in the theater; and I have no children to let loose to run free like animals between the seats, defecating wherever they please. In other words, none of the reasons to go to the movies that apparently appeal to everyone else in the theater really applies to me. So that’s not an option.

I’d rent movies, but I suffer from a condition known as “Video Store-Related Dementia.” Whenever I walk into a Blockbuster, no matter how firmly I am set on picking up a particular movie, I get two feet into the building and lose control of my mental faculties. Wandering aimlessly through the isles, I inevitably walk out with some unbelievable piece of shit from the mid-eighties, shot on recycled videotape, that I’ll also wind up returning 11 months late.

That’s why people like me watch movies on basic cable. But this is not ideal. First of all, they’re heavily edited. Second, with all of the commercials, they all wind up being, like, three hours long. It’s kind of mentally grueling, actually. A few months ago I watched A Bridge Too Far on AMC, and by the end of it, I was exhausted. It took something like six hours to get through the whole thing, thanks to the commercials.

I’d watch more movies on TV, but frankly, I often don’t have the energy. That’s why they get played so often on the weekend.

Say I start watching Scream 2 on Saturday morning, around 10am. Okay, but I’ve got work around the house to do so I wander away from the living room and miss 90% of the movie. Fortunately, I’ve got roughly 47 more chances to check it out in the next two days.

So it’s me. I’m the guy.

| December 30th, 2006 | by BC | Categories: Art, Pop Culture | Trackback | No Comments »



THE BAD SEX AWARD

Saturday, December 30th, 2006

This year’s Literary Review Bad Sex in Fiction award goes to… Iain Hollingshead:

Iain Hollingshead was this year’s winner, for a passage in his first novel Twentysomething (Duckworth). It was announced at a lavish ceremony in St James’s Square, London. Actress, rock star and author Courtney Love stylishly presented the award.

Note that they didn’t use the word, “classy.” If you never thought you’d live long enough to see Courtney Love hand out a literary award (sort of), you were (sort of) wrong.

As many others have said, writing sex scenes can be difficult. Unlike watching a sunset or eating a fine meal, it’s not an activity that one can usually stop and take notes in the midst of without drastically altering the mood. This may have something to do with the proliferation of cameras in the bedroom.
Other  writers that made the Bad Sex shortlist were Will Self, Thomas Pynchon, and David Mitchell, illustrating that even some of the best writers can muff their sex-scenes (though the Pynchon passage is probably intentionally funny).

Here’s an excerpt of the winning entry:

Oh Jack, she was moaning now, her curves pushed up against me, her crotch taut against my bulging trousers, her hands gripping fistfuls of my hair. She reaches for my belt. I groan too, in expectation. And then I’m inside her, and everything is pure white as we’re lost in a commotion of grunts and squeaks, flashing unconnected images and explosions of a million little particles.

I’m sure the rest of the book is fine, but that’s not hot. Then again, it’s out of context.

| December 30th, 2006 | by BC | Categories: Miscellaneous | Trackback | No Comments »



META: MORE THAN THE USUAL NON-ACTION

Friday, December 29th, 2006

Sorry about the lack of activity here; I know it’s expected at the end of the year, but the reason I haven’t been posting is that I’ve had a kick-ass flu. I won’t bore you with the sordid biological details of my illness. I will try to be back Monday.

| December 29th, 2006 | by BC | Categories: Meta | Trackback | No Comments »



OUR YEAR IN BOOKS, PART 2

Tuesday, December 26th, 2006

See part one.

Hollywood Babylon, by Kenneth Anger:
I ended up reading this book because, at the time, I kept running across references to it and wanted to see what it was all about. It manages to be gossipy and indignant at the same time; Hollywood was a brand new thing, and the people who became its stars were like children without adequate supervision, being held accountable for their actions not by people who cared about their interests, but by parasites in the tabloid press, and now enjoy this chapter about Fatty Arbuckle. The book feels outdated now, not because many of the celebrities involved have passed into obscurity, but because the book can’t compare with the crack-addled antics of the current crop of famous whack-jobs.

In the National Interest, by Marvin Kalb and Ted Koppel:
Read our 100-Penny Review of this book.

A Confederacy of Dunces, by John Kennedy Toole:
“You just read that?” Yes, as I pointed out in Part 1 of this little retrospective, I’m only listing books that I read for the first time this year (with one exception, and this isn’t it). Officially listed as a comic novel, I found this one a bit of a slog. A good book, but it’s not really as funny to me as it is to others. A broke fat guy with mother issues — I read to escape, okay? Comedy is sadism, but just about everybody in this book deserves a punch in the mouth. Knowing that Toole killed himself didn’t help to imbue the book with much hilarity, either.

The Confusion, by Neal Stephenson:
Book Two in the Baroque Cycle. It was fun to read, not just in a plot-and-characters sense, but the actual writing was fun to read.

Spock Must Die! by James Blish:
Dedicating yourself to reviewing books purchased for only a dollar (hence the “100-Penny Review”) means taking risks; like reading a disintegrating copy of a Young Adult franchise-universe book that just happens to be written by a master of science fiction. Rejected as a review book because I misplaced it and therefore can not give it the in depth treatment it deserves. An interesting thing to note is that the book, though deception is a major theme in it, has no plot twists. I spent the entire book over-thinking everything, and was actually shocked when things turned out the way they seemed to be on course to turn out.

| December 26th, 2006 | by BC | Categories: Miscellaneous | Trackback | No Comments »



Site Feeds

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives:

By Category

By Date


Search This Site


RSS Posts at Snappy Patter

RSS Links of Interest

Arts & Entertainment

Books & Literature

Comic Strips

General Interest

Money & Commerce

Politics & Philosophy

Science & Technology

Meta