Sloganeering.Org
home | archive | about | site policies | contact us | s.o store

Archive for September, 2007

YOU’LL EAT S**T, AND YOU’LL LIKE IT

Thursday, September 27th, 2007

Lifehacker linked to a post over at Zen Habits called, “How to Accept Criticism with Grace and Appreciation.” It’s a great post, and Zen Habits has a lot of good information on how to become a better, happier person. But…

Okay, we get how you shouldn’t immediately blow up when you receive negative criticism. That’s good Internet advice; if everyone followed it, there would be far fewer flame-wars or comment thread dust-ups, and whatnot. But, the ability to take criticism with grace is something that any low-ranking office worker has to master if they ever want to get anywhere.

“Why is this printed on yellow paper? I told you it should be on canary.” Or, “I don’t care if she’s not in the building — get her to sign this right now.” Or, “I called you at 2 o’clock this morning — why didn’t you answer? Where the hell were you?” Add your own office criticisms.

Even better are the times when you overhear your boss criticizing you while talking to someone else. Usually, they’re complaining about your performance (often regarding a project you didn’t even work on) in order to deflect the blame that should have landed squarely on them. Take the criticism with grace or find yourself out of a job, looking for something that matches your skills, and you wind up back where you started.

I once complained about the off-base, whacked-out, and just plain wrong-wrong-wrong criticism, to a manager of mine. (He wasn’t the one criticizing me.)  This is what he said: “Look, part of working for a living is eating shit. That’s mostly what we do all day — we take shit from customers, we take shit from upper management, we take shit from the tech support guys. Professionalism is the ability to eat shit and smile smile smile.”

I’m not sure if he got that last part from a poster or a Vonnegut book.

Be the bigger person. Thank your critic. Eat shit, and smile smile smile.

| September 27th, 2007 | by BC | Categories: Work | Trackback | No Comments »



WHY I DON’T READ WEBCOMICS ANYMORE…

Wednesday, September 26th, 2007

… and two exceptions.

Years ago, I had a job in a call center. They had to staff it 24 hours, and I got stuck on the dead shift. Really, there would be business for about four hours, and then, poof, nothing.

I was a young man, going to school, trying to make something out of my life, trying to work on my art, and a job at odd hours that required no mental exertion seemed ideal. But then, I had to deal with the reality of four hours of absolutely nothing.

Well, I did have an Internet connection. And, in those early days (before the tech-boom, even) there were quite a few webcomics out there. I learned I could spend several hours a night clicking through their archives.

These days, I haven’t got that kind of time. I’m busy from the moment I show up at work until I leave, and then I work a little more after I get home. I barely have time to write anything for this old blog, let alone keep track of the complex story-lines  of the sequential art I used to enjoy.

And if I run into a new, promising webcomic by accident? A lot of them require that you have some idea of what’s gone on in the past. Oh sure, they still have archives, but often they reach back several years. I can’t click through all those damn things. I haven’t the time.

No time. No time at all. I mean, I don’t even have the time to watch television.

| September 26th, 2007 | by BC | Categories: Miscellaneous | Trackback | No Comments »



PURSUIT OF THE COWARDS

Friday, September 21st, 2007

Ed Champion (of Bat Segundo and blog fame) has posted an experience that outlines one of my pet assertions about the world we live in: Many public figures are cowards. Completely insecure, terrified, heart-poundingly fearful cowards. I’ve gone on about this sort of thing before. We live in the age of talking points and access. They define our media environment to a ridiculous degree, warping it into something far beyond uselessness — it’s become downright evil.

I don’t have the moral authority to pick out my own socks, but I stand firmly behind my declaration that entertainment interviews are pointless, boring, irritating to both interviewer and celebrity alike. Now, however, I’m starting to think that my scope was too narrow.

In my daydreams at least, I’m starting to imagine a world in which the media finds its long-lost chutzpa, and refuses to do any interviews at all. They have more power than they seem to realize, if only they’d deign to work together for once. In my completely unrealistic fantasies, I see a moratorium: either start approaching interviews with some freaking backbone, or there won’t be any at all.

But no. The cowardice will continue.

| September 21st, 2007 | by BC | Categories: Miscellaneous | Trackback | No Comments »



CHERRY PICKERS DON’T HARM SHOPS

Thursday, September 20th, 2007

From the Science Blog:

“Extreme cherry pickers,” grocery shoppers who buy only sale items and nothing else, do not harm retailer profits significantly as generally is believed, according to a forthcoming study in the Journal of Marketing Research.

So feel free to keep checking the Consumerist and Dealhack; you’re not hurting anybody.

| September 20th, 2007 | by BC | Categories: Money & Commerce | Trackback | No Comments »



EVERYTHING’S FINE

Thursday, September 20th, 2007

Stop being so worried about the kids lack of interest in reading. This complaining has been going on since the dawn of children’s television, yet, somehow, there are still lots of former children that read for pleasure. (Many of whom -gasp!- write litblogs!)

And by the way, who says that kids aren’t reading? What about Harry Potter? What about manga? What about things that aren’t even books?  Just because they aren’t carrying giant, hardcover editions of Thomas Hardy novels around, and just because they don’t bother to observe the rules of grammar and spelling in causual situations (like text messaging or the Internet), that’s no reason to think that everyone born between the years 1992 and1999 are illiterate morons. You want to know how to reach the “youth-market”? Fine. I’ll tell ‘ya.

But you won’t like it.

Releasing books in dual formats, like some have suggested, isn’t enough. You’ve got to think bigger. The words are the thing. Where they are isn’t all that important, because they should be everywhere.

Seriously. If someone wants to read a book on their cellphone, they should be able to. Or on the Internet. Or iPod. Or whatever — the books should be available as hell. Hardback, softback, electronic, audio, even Powerpoint slides if that’s what people want — once it becomes digital, format conversion is trivial. Or should be.

You know why there isn’t a good ebook reader? I don’t know. But I know what it would look like. It needs to be able to display any book from any publisher, and cost less that $100. That’s it.

Imagine it: buying an ebook reader that you know you can use for any book ever published, past, present and future, by any publisher in any language, no matter where you buy it from. At a hundred dollars, it would quickly become a must-have item for the avid reader.

But, no. Some ebook readers want to lock you into their own virtual store, or their own weird file format.  And some publishers can’t bear the thought of releasing their content into the world without chaining a three-ton safe to it. And some writers don’t want to be published digitally because only losers publish things digitally. Because when you release a novel to, say, 10,000 subscribers via cell-phone, you don’t get a smartly-bound hardcover volume that stands a good chance of out-living you.

And it’s not just an issue of formats. A lot of kids read things like fan-fiction. On the Internet, even! Because they care so much about the franchise universes they’ve glommed onto that they’re willing to burn their eyes out staring at a computer screen so they can read about television characters. That’s commitment right there, and instead of trying to figure out how to serve an under-served group of people, the rightful owners of the characters want to shut the servers down without even considering a replacement. Are you meeting a need with this fan fiction stuff? How about if I turn it off, and then refuse to consider some sort of money-making alternative that might satisfy us both?

Is any of this making sense?

No, no, of course not. No, you couldn’t possibly, no it’s all wrong, every last bit of it. For terribly good reasons, and everything, and you just keep doing what you’re doing. It’s fine.

| September 20th, 2007 | by BC | Categories: Money & Commerce | Trackback | No Comments »



Site Feeds

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives:

By Category

By Date


Search This Site


RSS Posts at Snappy Patter

RSS Links of Interest

Arts & Entertainment

Books & Literature

Comic Strips

General Interest

Money & Commerce

Politics & Philosophy

Science & Technology

Meta