Sloganeering.Org
home | archive | about | site policies | contact us | s.o store

Archive for October, 2007

HALLOWEEN: A FEW THOUGHTS

Tuesday, October 30th, 2007

We’ve heard people say that Christmas seems to come earlier and earlier every year. And, yes, sometimes it feels that way, sure. But the holiday that always seems to sneak up on me is Halloween. I suppose that’s appropriate.

Oh sure, as a child, I was counting the days. The prospect of free candy was the primary source of anticipation, but there was also the sheer thrill of being outside, wandering the neighborhood, after dark. As a boy, Halloween was the nexus of adrenaline and sugar. What could be more enticing?

The thing that bothers me about this holiday is that I’m not entirely sure what adults want get out of it. Don’t get me wrong; dressing up and knocking on strangers’ doors after sundown can still be a source of thrills, chills, and possible criminal proceedings for the adventurous oldster. But the stakes are maybe just a little too high for most of us.

As grown-ups, the modern, American Halloween has not traditionally been geared towards our age-group. It’s primary rewards — adventure and sweets — have been accessible only to children, for the most part. The closest activity that most parents are able to get their hands on is the ritualistic inspection of candy for needles, razor blades, and hypodermic punctures.

I think that adults are trying to take over Halloween. I think especially that single people without children are making this move, but I’ve seen plenty of kids out with their grandparents, which implies that their mothers and fathers are out doing their own things.

And when it comes to the things that get grown-ups excited, we’re awfully predictable; bring on the sex and drugs.

This, I think, is one explanation for the ubiquity of sexy costumes for grown-ups — to such a degree that modest, fun outfits are getting harder and harder to find. We want to have fun, we want excitement and really wild times, and we’re already allowed to drink; why not make Halloween the one night of the year when we can parade around half-naked and get totally hammered?

Pity the poor adolescents, then. Too old to trick or treat, to young to have easy access to more adult activities. The 17 year olds at your door in pathetic, perfunctory costumes, aren’t just assholes; they’re deeply troubled people, and if you don’t give them a Snickers bar, they’re also capable of causing real damage to your property — or your face.

Then there are those who believe in the transformative power of Halloween. They are the ones among us who would dress in costume every day, if that wouldn’t make them immediate targets of bullying, ostracism, or even terrible violence, in some cases. A change of clothes can, these folks believe, actually change the person you are.

I worry about these folks a little. They don’t seem to like who they are (or who they must pretend to be) very much, and believing that clothes are a key to becoming the person you really want to be lures them away from making some kind of peace with the world. Be true to yourself, yes. Develop an identity, absolutely. But, try to recognize that you might also be making life harder than it needs to be, not for idealistic reasons, but out of resentment over the fact that the world isn’t really concerned whether you live or die.

One last thing about Halloween, then I’m off. I promise.

Halloween is the only major American holiday with pagan roots that hasn’t been subsumed into Christianity. Easter and Christmas (coincidentally, I’m sure) have deep non-Christian roots. December was the time of Mithras and Saturnalia. Modern Easter holiday imagery has its roots in ancient symbols of fertility. Since people were partying during those parts of the year anyway, Christianity took the broad-minded (and rather pragmatic) step of incorporating them into its own world-view. Of course you can keep your celebrations; the one true faith has room in it for believers to have a good time.

Halloween is different. It’s secular trappings might be innocuous enough, but its origins are sinister. And, oddly, they have not been overlaid with a Christian message. Dance around the pagan maypole if you want, but remember Christ’s death and resurrection. Make time to be with your family and exchange gifts and cards, but also, you should think about the birth of your savior.  On Halloween, though, put on a costume, grab some candy and… uh, what else?

So, there you have it. Have a happy Halloween, if you’re into that sort of thing.

| October 30th, 2007 | by BC | Categories: Miscellaneous, Religion | Trackback | No Comments »



FARK CROSS-REFERENCE PROJECT: 1 OF 1

Monday, October 29th, 2007

Owner of local gas station wins lottery and cuts the price of gas by over 50% at his gas pumps so local residents can share in the happiness

Roughly one-third of lottery winners find themselves in serious financial trouble or bankrupt within five years

Meta-tag assigned to this cross reference: Obvious

Difficulty: Too Easy

Okay, your turn.

| October 29th, 2007 | by BC | Categories: Miscellaneous, Money & Commerce | Trackback | No Comments »



WIRELESS NEEDS TO BE READY

Monday, October 29th, 2007

Slashdot has a post that links to an article, which projects that handheld supercomputers might be feasible in the 10 to 15 years. Hey, that’s great; we’re all for super-powerful handheld computers. One question, though: what are we going to do with them?

Well, what are people using handheld computers for right now? Precious little. Because if you really want to get things done while you’re mobile, you’re better off carrying a laptop or a smartphone. And man, those smartphones are everywhere, aren’t they?

It’s proof that people want mobile access to the Internet. It’s even proofier when you consider how terrible the mobile browsing experience on these devices. The fact that people went ga-ga over the iPhone’s almost-acceptably-average Internet features demonstrates this.

Mobile broadband is expensive and, in some places, not as reliable as the ads would have you believe. (Shocking! We know.) And, unlike the processor sector, the mobile data delivery folks haven’t innovated for shit, here in the States.

So, there’s a very real possibility that we’ll have hand held devices that could render a mid-ninties Pixar film in a reasonable amount of time, but can’t stream a low-res YouTube video for shit.

Yeah, that’ll work.

| October 29th, 2007 | by BC | Categories: Science & Technology | Trackback | No Comments »



CELEBRITY TACTICS ADVANCE

Thursday, October 25th, 2007

We haven’t said anything about the Ellen/Iggy fiasco because, frankly, we don’t give a shit; also, we have nothing to add. Yes, we know: celebrities are spoiled, and some animal people are crazy, and nobody’s learned anything from all this nonsense. Except, according to Greg Beato, DeGeneres may have stumbled upon a new, emulatable tactic that other celebs can use to get their own way.

If you’re an ordinary person and you post a teary, ludicrously over-the-top tirade lamenting the tiny wrongs that have been done to you on YouTube, expect indifference and abuse from semi-literate 13-year-olds. If you’re famous, it’s a much different story, sort of like the Bat-Signal in reverse. Within hours, all of Gotham City will be volunteering to help you vanquish your enemies. It’s the best thing to happen to stardom since the invention of photo retouching.

So now, with only a teary monologue and a video camera, just about any celebrity can launch a host of mis-spelled email death-threats at anyone that crosses them. Couple that with the rise of the celebrity-defending YouTube famewhore and, well, you start to worry about society. Are we a nation of neglected children, bent on seeking approval from the unapproachable objects of our adoration? Listen, no matter how much you love your favorite celebrities, they will never love you back.

| October 25th, 2007 | by BC | Categories: Fandom, Pop Culture | Trackback | No Comments »



TV HATES ME #14402

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

I was minding my own business the other night, not really paying much attention to the television at the other end of the room, when, suddenly, a disturbing new commercial was played.

No, it’s not that All Bran commercial, but it’s in the same general hips-and-their-environs, human body neighborhood. Viva Viagra? What the fuck? (I may not have linked to the correct ad, here. The computer I’m using doesn’t have Flash installed.)

Anyway, the ad I saw featured two middle-aged people frolicing, slowly, carefully, in a swimming pool with candles floating around in it. And the music was a subdued remake on “Viva Las Vegas”, only with the word Viagra replacing the Las Vegas part and, lord help me if that didn’t make me feel a little dirty. I couldn’t help thinking, “I wonder if the makers of this ad are trying to imply that these two boomers are going to have easy-going, onset of arthritis-style sex in that candle-lit pool.”

And, because my dirty mind has largely been molded (and mouldered) by television over the past 30 years (or so), it’s very easy for marketers to know what it is that people like me will think when they see their ads. So, in order to make it absolutely clear that the couple in the pool isn’t actually going to — uh, couple in the pool, they’ve included a shot of them running (carefully) into the house.

Ewww. Somehow, that makes it worse. Not that they know; but that I know that they know.

| October 22nd, 2007 | by BC | Categories: Miscellaneous, Psychology | Trackback | No Comments »



Site Feeds

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives:

By Category

By Date


Search This Site


RSS Posts at Snappy Patter

RSS Links of Interest

Arts & Entertainment

Books & Literature

Comic Strips

General Interest

Money & Commerce

Politics & Philosophy

Science & Technology

Meta