Sloganeering.Org
home | archive | about | site policies | contact us | s.o store

Archive for April, 2008

Just Walk Away, Giggling

Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008

Recently, I attempted to go back to school. Not very hard, mind you; I signed up for a once-a-week evening class at the local community college. And, rather than starting some general education course that would allow my brain to shift gears and think about something other than work, the course I chose was distinctly work-related.

I honestly don’t know what I was thinking.

I resolved that I would stick to the class, no matter what. Because I’m an inveterate quitter, and I’m trying to change. So I sat there, while the teacher kept telling us how we need to change our attitudes if we wanted to make it in the real world (I just came from the “real world”. Can I go?); I sat through the lectures that went nowhere, taught nothing, and still managed to last four hours. I did not get up and leave when, six weeks into the course, the teacher realized that he had the wrong edition of the book he was supposed to be teaching from. I did the homework that he never looked at, took the quizzes he never returned. I was sticking with it.

And then I quit.

I know, I know. I had expressly forbidden myself from quitting. But you have to understand, this was different; this was…

Oh my god, it felt good. To quit. It felt so amazingly awesome that I wanted to sign up and quit again. It was like breaking the surface and taking a breath of cool, fresh air. Light and joy had returned to my life. Holy crap, quitting was the best thing ever.

That’s probably a dangerous attitude to have. Because I’ll take any excuse to leave something half done, if it’s an option. And yet, again, I’ll contend that this time was different. Because it’s the first time I’ve learned something from a class that I’d dropped.

The lesson: Don’t try to complete things for completeness’ sake; if something is dragging you down, or a pointless waste of resources, cut it off. What would I have gained from sticking with the class-from-hell? One-point-five units. That’s all. What I gained from quitting, however, is a grounding in the subject, an authoritative book on it, and confidence that I can learn it all on my own — all things I would not have gained if I hadn’t taken the class in the first place.

So, quitting was the optimal approach: I spent exactly as much time in the class as I needed to get what I wanted, and dropped it before it crushed my will to live. I just need to learn to do that with some other aspects of my life, and I’ll be all set.

| April 23rd, 2008 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Miscellaneous | Trackback | No Comments »



Open Source is not Always the Answer

Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008

First, we read this. Then, we read this. Then we read this and this. And, while we were reading, we kept waiting and waiting to see something that might convince us that this is a good idea. But nothing doing.

To be fair, we haven’t got the right to comment on this, in a sense. We weren’t there. We haven’t spoken to the participants. We don’t have any special insight into the events that transpired, nor any particular talent at understanding the human condition. We are not women. On the other hand, we do have the ability to be a little disturbed, and a venue in which to express our thoughts, and that’s a kind of right to deal with some of the issues raised here.

Regardless of the organizers’ intentions, we find the project to be gross. There is the possibility that our own phobias have jaundiced our view (we intensely dislike touching or being touched by strangers), but given the response, we are inclined to think that our intellectual (ha!) objections might have some merit.

Our point, if we have one, is this: to create an environment in which some group of people is encouraged to volunteer for an action of one kind or another, regardless of how innocent it might seem to those volunteering, or doing the encouraging, there is every chance that a harmful environment will result. Because, thanks to the complexity of social interaction and unique, individual paths to enculturation, you cannot know what the effects of such actions will be.

A person who happens to witness the curious event of a man asking a woman if he can touch her breasts, followed by consent to breast-touching, may feel any number of ways. In each individual case, the effect of the observation is unknown before the fact; in many cases, that effect may be negative, threatening. And that’s not even considering possibility that the observer, or another random woman, will be approached with a similar proposition, with a response ranging from bemusement, all the way up to feeling as though she had been assaulted. (Of course there are some who mightmight — suggest a course in “manning up”, but this would be at the far, far end of the scale, wouldn’t it? Not worth considering, then.)

Let’s see… there was something else about this whole thing that bothered us, but what was it?

Oh yes, now we remember.

(more…)

| April 23rd, 2008 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Barbarism, Gender, The Internet Will Shame You | Trackback | 1 Comment »



META: A Note About Snappy Patter

Tuesday, April 22nd, 2008

Simul-posted at Sloganeering.Org & Snappy Patter

After the redesign/relaunch of Sloganeering.Org as a blog, the mini-sabbatical, and the up-tick in posting in that space, I’m afraid Snappy Patter has not really been getting very much attention.

Snappy Patter was intended as a kind of B-side compilation; or, more explicitly, a dumping ground for posts of a more personal nature that nobody would really be interested in. In reality, it was to be a place where I could cry in my beer, get a little “Livejournaly” without the fear of being noticed.

What has happened was this: the stain of what is “personal” has begun to creep around the edges of Sloganeering.Org, leaking into the margins of the page. I think it has made most of the posts over there rather better, frankly. It’s also made the contemplation of the “publish” button a great deal more harrowing.

And I realized that, readers or no, I just don’t have the guts to publish anything more revealing about myself than I’ve already done. I may even regret a few posts that have come out, although the effects at this point have been pretty harmless in most respects, except perhaps to my ego and how I am perceived by others.

So, now: I’ve developed a semi-personal voice over at Sloganeering.Org; I’ve started to commit my whiny bullshit to a burn-journal (that is, an actual paper book that will be burnt as soon as it is filled) and Snappy Patter has been left mostly empty.

So, what do I do now about Snappy Patter? Leave it to rot like so many other blogs I’ve started, and then abandoned? Is there a place for a 2nd blog in my online life?

I’m beginning to think that yes, there is.

The inspiration struck when I read a post over at Chaos Theory, in which the proprietress there mentioned a separation between a blog for ranting and a blog for posting links. And that sounded like a really good idea, to me.

Because a link blog can be playful and short. Sloganeering.Org has begun to take on a seriocomic tone, which I’m pleased with — and yet, I know that it’s probably the most irritating reading in the world, as far as other people are concerned. It’ll never go back to the impersonal, professional-aping style it once projected — I don’t think it will, at any rate — but there are reasons not to simply dump links with pithy comments on it.

The layout of S.O was built around longer posts. Longer posts just look better on it. And I like writing them that way, even if it means doing everything wrong, blog-wise. In Snappy Patter’s new mission, I see the freedom to be brief, casual, hopefully more fun — and, perhaps, a bit more prolific.

At any rate, I’m going to give it a go. If the new layout of Snappy Patter doesn’t exactly please the eye, please understand that it’s deliberately plain. In fact, this blog is intended to be almost ridiculously suited to viewing from an RSS feed. Anyway, thanks for reading.

Help us improve!
Sloganeering.Org Reader Survey @ Polldaddy

| April 22nd, 2008 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Meta | Trackback | 2 Comments »



Or Are You Toxic For Me?

Tuesday, April 22nd, 2008

Aw, how sweet:

Are there places on the net, in the real world, where people still believe that someday, someplace, when the right time comes–you’re going to meet that someone who you’ve been waiting for your entire life. Not someone who you have a life size cut-out of, but just a general idea of how he or she should be–kind, generous, loving, you know–the usual. Or is this asking for too much?

What I’m specifically looking for are instances of such experiences happening to people out there, who’d be willing to share it with me, to give me hope that it might not be the impossible dream that so many people say it is.

Really, it’s just too cute. What, you think we’re going to make fun of this post just because it’s a little precious? Listen, pal: we’re willing to stand up and defend schmalz, innocence, and naiveté with every dirty Nixonian trick we can muster.

However… this fellow wants to know if there’s a place where people believe you can sit around on your ass, doing nothing, and still wind up with the love of your life. And that place — well, it’s not here, that’s for certain.

But he’s also looking for stories that confirm his crazy ideas about soul-mate entitlement. And we have one. We really do. Not that it happened to us; we are but observers in this tale.

There was a person, just minding her own business with school and work. Certainly, she wasn’t looking for anyone to spend the rest of her life with. Then, one day, she looked across the room — and there he was. They fell madly in love with one another, spent days just hanging out and sharing the calm tranquility of the True Love they shared. After a blissful year or two (call it, say, 18 months) both their lives were grand — and then she met Him. And they fell madly in love with one another, and et cetera. And it was Him, that second guy, who turned out to be her soul mate.

The moral of the story is, like most of the morals we promulgate, “You’ve got to know when to hold ‘em, know when to fold ‘em.” Thank you St. Kenny.

Link via Chaos Theory

| April 22nd, 2008 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Miscellaneous, Satire | Trackback | No Comments »



Dignity is Not Getting Cut Up

Tuesday, April 22nd, 2008

We borrowed a set of Sherlock Holmes DVDs from the library the other day (the Jeremy Brett/Granada TV version), and spent almost a whole weekend watching them. Over time, it began to occur to us that this was a television show that wasn’t afraid to present a rich variety of of very old, very wrinkly people. We mean, they were very bold. Close-ups of crinkled jowls. Extreme close-ups of wilted eyelids. Old folks — in your face, up close and personal.

Needless to say, we were shocked. And a little delighted, too.

Now, it’s probably not fair to attach brave intentions to an older television show, produced in a foreign country, whose audience was comprised of people who could un-ironically refer to Jeremy Brett as “Young Man”; nor is it entirely just to label newer, American shows as “cowardly” in comparison. Still, one must admit that it would take gargantuan balls for any popular TV show in this day and age to dwell so long, and so closely, on these unpreserved faces and necks.

Our reaction to the sudden exposure to the faces of the very old and un-lifted and non-botoxed was only mildly surprising; not shock, not disgust — it suddenly occurred to us how much we miss old people.

Of course, there are still old folks around, in real life. But if you watch much television, you can’t help but notice a Logan’s Run-style dearth of aged people. At least, unaltered aged people.

We’re not the first to proclaim our dismay at the cosmetic mutilations visited upon our public figures; frankly, we find the results grotesque. We don’t doubt that each victim of elective surgery has his or her own motives for going under the knife, perhaps it’s instructive to look towards the other bastion of plastic surgery, adult film performers.

It seems that legitimate film actors aren’t getting work done to maintain some standard of beauty, or dignity as they age — rather, they’re trying to remain sexually alluring. Which is a shame; shouldn’t we have at least few actors we admire whom we don’t necessarily want to have sex with?

Say we’re naive all you like, but this rising class of 50-year olds who look like 30-year old burn victims means something. It speaks directly to the convergence of art and commerce: the most important thing about an actor is now whether or not lots of people want to have sex with him or her, and how that translates into sales.

We’re not saying this is bad or good, mind. We’re just saying.

Also, we’d like to see more talented, not-grasping-for-sexy older people on television.

| April 22nd, 2008 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Entertainment | Trackback | No Comments »



Site Feeds

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives:

By Category

By Date


Search This Site


RSS Posts at Snappy Patter

RSS Links of Interest

Arts & Entertainment

Books & Literature

Comic Strips

General Interest

Money & Commerce

Politics & Philosophy

Science & Technology

Meta