Sloganeering.Org
home | archive | about | site policies | contact us | s.o store

Archive for September, 2008

Hey You — Get Off of That Cloud

Friday, September 19th, 2008

Last week’s On The Media program featured an interview with Marissa Mayer, vice president of "Search Products and User Experience", wherein she discussed Google’s approach to privacy. It’s often a bad idea to boil things down too much, but we find this statement from Ms Mayer to be particularly informative: "Yes, you’re giving up some personal information but you’re gaining a lot of functionality, and it’s important to understand what we do collect and what we don’t collect."

We also find that all of the concerns about Google and privacy dovetail pretty neatly with several conversations we’ve recently had about the reliability of the cloud.

Sure, in some respects it’s great: you can access your documents and email anywhere that you’ve got access to a computer. On the other hand, when the cloud (or the service that’s part of it) is not available, you’re dead in the water. And then there’s all those privacy concerns.

Well, let’s just say that some people are starting to get a little kernel of doubt about the cloud lodged in their brains. But you might still want to take advantage of the convenience of always having access to your stuff, don’t you? So now what?

Hmm… you could carry a thumbdrive with you all the time. If you’ve got access to a computer, then you just stick your drive into it, start the PortableApps software, launch your word processor, and there you go. With your docs stored on your drive, and an offline editor, you don’t have to worry that some admin somewhere will get hold of your brilliant vampire-high school manuscript before you’re ready to publish it.

And the fun doesn’t stop there: with a sufficiently large storage capacity, you could carry your whole digital life on one of these things — even email. No Google login required.

But you’ll forget your thumbdrive. Or, perhaps, you’ll lose it, thereby giving some weirdo access to all your deepest thoughts and dreams (note to self: stop storing these things on my thumb drive). Sure, there are ways to secure your info, but they can be broken by anyone sufficiently motivated to do so. And anyway, you can always put the damn thing on your keychain.

Graaah! I hear you say. There’s too much stuff on your keychain already. Okay, fine. What else to you carry around with you wherever you go, that you’re careful about not losing?

Oh, well, too bad — your mobile phone probably isn’t set up for that sort of thing … wait, why not?

If we’re increasingly spending more time with our cell phones, and if they have the capacity to store data, and if they can connect to the PCs we encounter in our day to day lives, then why don’t they act as portable desktop repositories?

We never ever say never. But we suspect that this kind of thing isn’t going to happen very soon. After all, there is a general consensus that cell phones, generally, suck pretty badly. They’re closed off, proprietary, and costly to upgrade. They lack any hint of the flexibility that made personal computers the super-useful behemoths that they are today.

But, if it all somehow gets sorted out — if we really can make our phones the repository of all our portable digital stuff, then maybe the giants of cloud computer will have something to worry about. We doubt it, but maybe there’s a chance.

Then again, collaboration is difficult to manage without relying on some kind of remote storage. So, in the end, we’ll all be using the cloud. So there’s that.

| September 19th, 2008 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Science & Technology | Trackback | No Comments »



You v. Wall Street

Thursday, September 18th, 2008

If there’s one thing that I’ve learned from the recent shake-ups on Wall Street, it’s this: I have no idea what’s going on. The ins and outs of financial markets have become so twisted, so complex, that a layperson has about as much knowledge about how they work as he or she does about how a fission reactor does its thing; without an advanced degree, and years of study, all we’ve got is the executive summary.

I’ve been hearing about deregulation all my life — assured, by some, that it was just the bee’s nipples. Regulations, some said, do nothing but impede growth and innovation. Others say that a "wild west" attitude, and unchecked, unsafe behavior on the part of the rich and the powerful (often the same people — funny how that works out) can wind up hurting the less rich and powerful.

So, who’s right? Given the complexity of the financial system, the regulations surrounding it, and whatnot, who can say? Not being economists or analysts ourselves, we can only rely on the pronouncements of the people our news-media claims are experts on the topic, the same way we rely on physicists to assure us that the nuclear power plant down the road isn’t going to kill us. The problem is (as ever) that they can’t seem to agree either. Other than your own political biases, you haven’t the background to tell who’s right.

And, at this stage, we’re way beyond blame, even. At least, it’s useless in any practical sense; well, except for the emotional comfort that comes from slighting whatever group you happen to dislike, confirming your beliefs about how the world really works and insulating you from any real responsibility.

But, pragmatically, there’s no profit in blame, because whomever you choose to call out, they will not be held to account. If they’re broke, they’ve got nothing to take; if they’re rich, they’ll remain rich no matter what you do; politicians and faceless regulators seem to be made of Teflon, these days, wrapped up in plausible deniability and patsies.

The most galling thing about big, national stories with complex ramifications is, simply, as an average citizen, what do you do? And this, during an election year, when we the people get our say — the major presidential candidates don’t even sound that different when they talk about the meltdown. (Though one of them kind of had to re-think [not flip-flop, no no no] his position on the subject of AIG.)

Wall Street was designed by, and is maintained as, a giant, money generating machine. You, are not. So when they blow up, and everybody is telling you about the repercussions that are about to rain down on you and your family, what do you suppose you should do? Compounding this is the fact that you are just a small fraction of a large group of people who are remarkably similar to you; any action you could take is already being taken by someone who’s just a little quicker than yourself. And it’s difficult to haul others out of the water, when your own boat is sinking, too.

Say you want to sell off your stuff on eBay: First of all, other people are going to do the same thing, possibly driving the prices down, due to oversupply. Second, who the hell has money to waste on your trash anyway? So, maybe you want to try to curb your own expenses by purchasing things used, from thrift stores; good idea, but you’re a little late. You’ve already cleaned the place out — not you personally, but "you" as in the aggregate of people like you (only a little quicker).

So, you might think you’re a little smarter, a little better, than all those folks you spend your mornings and evenings surrounded by during rush hour. And maybe you are — but they’re not the problem.

Your best interests are not shared, looked-after, or even considered by the folks up on Wall Street who are currently putting your livelihood at risk. And maybe you think that’s how it should be, which is fine — more than fine, even. But it’s not something you should ever forget, something that shouldn’t be allowed to slip out of your conscious thoughts at any point during your waking life. They could destroy your retirement accounts; they could let your bank fall to pieces; their mistakes could cause ripples of such magnitude that they tear your employer to pieces. And, if that happens (god forbid), you just better pray that you’re actually as smart as you think you are — or just as lucky as you believe you aren’t.

Because AIG is to big to let fail; you on the other hand, are not.

| September 18th, 2008 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Money & Commerce, Paranoia, Politics | Trackback | No Comments »



What We’re Capable Of

Tuesday, September 16th, 2008

If we’ve been less than prolific lately (and we have), please be assured that it’s for a good reason. Or, at least, it’s for a reason. Or, failing that — um.

The problem is twofold: There’s been a shake-up at my day-job, that’s led to us being one person below headcount. The non-corporate speak version of that sentence is: Somebody quit.

So, of course, my team is having to pitch in and do this guy’s work, which is causing all of us a certain amount of grief. It’s not pretty, and you’ve probably been through this kind of thing, too, so you know what I’m saying.

I write an awful lot of posts for this site either late at night or during my lunch breaks at work, and then I schedule them to be posted the following day. Well, lunch has become unavailable, shall we say; also, I’m much less coherent at night than I used to be.

What’s worrying me these days is the possibility that someone, somewhere at my day job may decide that, since we’re managing to get everything done even though we’re short-handed, there’s no need to replace the guy who quit. Hey, think of the money we’ll save!

If you had enough open road, you could drive everywhere at 120 mph, all the time. Of course, you’ll probably fuck up your engine and shorten its life-span, but you could do it. Some managers, as it happens, have lead feet.

But people are just things, and if the people you’re dealing with happen to be cheap, well, we know how that goes. Like a dollar-store mop, you work it ’til the head comes off. Then get another one.

Sure, it might be a short-sighted management style, but considering the fact that your employees’ last cost of living increase was wiped out by rising inflation, that the only way to make more money is to either gain a promotion (not that there’s anywhere to go), or to leave your organization, why shouldn’t you expect 120%? What’s more, with you in the same boat, financially, you’ll probably be gone before the nasty effects of over-work rear their ugly heads.

So, go on middle-managers: shake it ’til you break it!

| September 16th, 2008 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Money & Commerce, Work | Trackback | No Comments »



Eye Eye Eye!

Monday, September 15th, 2008

E-readers: yuck.

I’ve sort of given up on privately daydreaming about what the perfect e-book reader would look like. For a person in my position (a non-influential nobody) it’s kind of a pointless act, since I don’t have the resources to produce any kind of technological product, nor do I have the ear of anyone who could.

I have been paying attention to what others say, of course. Mostly, they’re complaining. Which is fine! Part of understanding what we want is knowing what we don’t want. And, while reliance on counter-examples can often lead to results that are just barely adequate rather than insanely great, but hey, we’re still at the beginning of an incipient ebook revolution (and we’ve been there for more than a decade now, but never mind); refinements will come in time.

But the main complaint I’ve been seeing has to do with the screens current ebook readers have, and the consequences that come from choosing one type of screen technology over another.

So: e-ink limits the overall functionality of a device, and other screen technologies either are too hard to read, or use too much battery life.

It seems obvious that a big sticking point is the tech used for the device’s screen. Well, what are we going to do about it? E-ink was created because — well, because somebody had a good idea about how to do it, but it was widely seen as being a just the thing to use on ebooks. Other screens, while more versatile, either use too much power, or they are difficult to read for long stretches.

The screen, then, is the major stumbling block (and here I thought is was because it’s hard to find an ebook reader for under $299, but what the hell do I know). That’s kind of a shame, because, about 12 years ago, when I first heard about e-ink in a Nicolas Negroponte essay in Wired, I immediately thought that it would finally allow us to clear the last hurdle between the general public and the widespread adoption of ebooks as a viable alternative to paper.

Oh well.

| September 15th, 2008 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Books & Literature, Science & Technology | Trackback | No Comments »



David Foster Wallace

Sunday, September 14th, 2008

According to several websites, David Foster Wallace is dead of an apparent suicide.

What the hell? What the HELL?

This is terrible, terrible news.

| September 14th, 2008 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Death, News | Trackback | No Comments »



Site Feeds

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives:

By Category

By Date


Search This Site


RSS Posts at Snappy Patter

RSS Links of Interest

Arts & Entertainment

Books & Literature

Comic Strips

General Interest

Money & Commerce

Politics & Philosophy

Science & Technology

Meta