Sloganeering.Org
home | archive | about | site policies | contact us | s.o store

Archive for January, 2009

Buy One, Get A Slightly Different One Free

Friday, January 30th, 2009

As curmudgeonly as I might seem to be when it comes to books and reading, I might as well let you in on a little secret: I actually love books. Even hardcovers, although I find their floppier counterparts more convenient to carry around and read. Hardcovers never accompany me on public transit or lengthy travels, because of this.

I received a copy of Neal Stephenson’s Anathem for Christmas this year, and so far it’s pretty good. Of course, being a rather large hardcover, I can only read it under ideal conditions; that is, at my house, in my chair. But I do have an old Palmpilot that I rescued from the trash that runs MobiPocket, so I decided to check out the digital edition of the book. Which runs for about $19.99. And that’s fine, because the hardcover was nearly thirty bucks, so if you were getting the e-book as an alternative. but, what if you’ve already paid for the hardcover? What if you want both?

It would be nice (though perhaps not practical) if buying a hardcover allowed one to download the e-edition for free. Of course, I know there are lots of reasons not to offer such a thing – concerns about piracy, technical feasibility, and the desperate hope that a business model will be developed that reliably results in customers who end up buying the same thing twice – but I couldn’t help day-dreaming about it, a little bit.

My main focus was imaging how such a system would work from a technical standpoint. You’d only want people who’ve already purchased the physical copy of a book to be able to download the e-version for no additional fee, after all. So how would you pull that off?

Well, a lot of technical books come with CD’s that contain an e-book version. You could do the same with books from other markets, too. But this is not ideal: the disc packaging tends to destroy the aesthetic appeal of the book; anyone with a pocket-knife and unmitigated gall could remove the disc without buying the book first.

Another option would be to include a unique code or password of some sort in the book that the customer could use to download the e-edition from a website. This would make it even easier to steal, just open the book and whip out a pen and paper (or camera-phone). But there is a model that might work pretty well for bundling e-books and physical books: I suggest looking toward pre-paid wireless.

When you buy a cellphone top-up (or recharge, or what have you) card, the transaction activates the card for use. If someone simply stole the card, they wouldn’t be able to get it to work. The code on the card would never be activated. It’s possible for someone to take the code off of a card without removing it from the store, but most cards use that silver stuff you find on scratch-off tickets to obscure the number. If you pick up a card at a store, and the silver stuff’s been rubbed off, you wouldn’t buy that card – because it means that someone’s probably got that code, already, and are just waiting for some one to activate it by paying for the card.

Theoretically, then, it should be possible to do the same thing with books. Publishers could affix a little silver scratch-off tag to the inside back cover (or wherever); when a customer purchases the book, the unique code for that book would be activated; then the customer could go online, input the code, and download the ebook version. If you pick up a book that’s scratched off already, you know not to buy it (or, maybe you do buy it, if you don’t care about the ebook version).

It’s fun to dream, of course, but I know this kind of thing may not happen for a while. The expense of setting up such system would be prohibitive, and the only real benefit would be for the very small group of users who read both ebooks and physical editions; would the promise of a free ebook-with-purchase entice the average reader to buy a book they might not have otherwise bought? Lot’s of good ideas (not that this is one) have to be set aside for the fact that they just won’t pay off. The publishing industry is in enough trouble as it is, I’m sure they don’t want to start some highly experimental, low-payoff project right now.

Still. it’s kind of an obvious idea, isn’t it? I’m certain that somebody’s come up with a plan like this before, and maybe they’ve actually implemented it somewhere. I’ll keep looking, just in case. It would be pretty neat.

| January 30th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Books & Literature, Science & Technology | Tags: , | Trackback | No Comments »



RIP: John Updike

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

The news is all over, but it bears mentioning: John Updike has died.

John Updike, the Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist, prolific man of letters and erudite chronicler of sex, divorce and other adventures in the postwar prime of the American empire, died Tuesday at age 76.

The remembrances are coming up all over; I don’t have a lot to add, except to say I’m saddened by this news. I’ve lost touch with his work over the past few years, but I fondly remember the books of his I’ve read, and the interviews he gave.

| January 27th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Books & Literature, Death | Trackback | 1 Comment »



Thunk

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

I’ve been writing for the web for almost seven years now, but lately I’ve started to notice something: I’m having more and more trouble assembling a coherent train of thought than I used to. I mean, of course the writing I produce has always been a series of sloppy messes; but at least I had a coherent idea to work from – the dreck that I’ve wound up posting usually got that way because I got lazy or impatient, and posted something that could have really benefitted from a revision or two. Now, though. . . I’m kind of getting lost inside my own brain.

Sometimes I worry that I’m losing my ability for linear thinking. To be able to take an idea from A to B to C, and so on. All I do all day at work is, basically, solve problems. Being a good problem-solver requires lots of different ways of thinking, but there’s a particular focus on being intuitive. Being intuitive is rewarded, because it can generally be faster than a more systematic approach.

If you need some technical resource in order to do your job, which scenario sounds better: One in which a systematic approach is taken, that carefully breaks down the problem into a million little pieces, eliminating each one through a series of controlled experiments, or one where somebody says, “Hmm, that’s weird – oh wait, let’s try this – hey, looks like it’s working. Neat!” The former might inspire more confidence in the method, but the second one gets things up and running more quickly, even if it requires an inexplicable leap of logic.

But if you’re going to try to get things solved intuitively, you’ve got to establish some background. You’ve got to read widely (almost wildly) about everything that might relate to what you are doing. And you’ve got to let all that information jumble up in your head; you never know what’s going to be useful. And you’ve got to allow yourself to make dozens of non-workable connections at any particular moment, and constantly see relationships even if they don’t have merit, because you never know when you’ll be called upon to do some bizarrely creatively useful repair job on something you’ve never seen before. You’ve got to keep the bingo cage spinning all the time, because the more numbers that come up, the more likely it is that it’ll be the right number, eventually.

All this can make a person useless for conversation. Because you’re leaping across an alligator-infest swamp in your own head, while the people you’re speaking with are strolling through a peaceful forest glade in theirs. Or, maybe they’ve got their own swamps to deal with, but in any event you’re not heading the same direction.

| January 27th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Miscellaneous, Psychology | Trackback | No Comments »



MST3K Fans, Please Note

Monday, January 26th, 2009

From Slashdot:

csn writes: "On Wednesday, January 28th at 6:00 PM PST and 9:00 PM EST, the stars of the cult television hit ‘Mystery Science Theater 3000′ will reunite to do what they do best – heckle bad movies. Join Mike Nelson, Kevin ‘Tom Servo’ Murphy and Bill ‘Crow T. Robot’ Corbett as they make fun of the 1950 short film, ‘Overcoming Fear,’ live over the internet.

I know this is kind of a short note, but I’m posting it here as I think more people read Sloganeering.Org than read Snappy Patter.

| January 26th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Entertainment | Trackback | No Comments »



Pat Holt Talks Sense About Hardcovers

Friday, January 23rd, 2009

(I was going to title this post, "Pat Holt Talks Sense" but then I’d have to link to everything she’s ever posted.)

It’s always nice to see something on the Internet that makes me feel a little less insane. Take this post by Pat Holt, for instance: Stop starting with hardcovers.

Oprah would love to tell her viewers they can save money on the books she loves from now on. Booksellers I’ve talked to say that if the original trade paperback “turns” twice as fast as the hardcover, no problem. Agents want higher numbers than hardcover sales can produce. Book bloggers are readers and they love trade paperbacks, as much as their audience. And besides: What book reviewers? What media?

I certainly hope that this post is being read by people who can do something about it. For heaven’s sake, it can be a year or more more between the harcover and trade paperback releases for some books, and if I’m not constantly reminded of a book’s existence, I’m not going to remember it for that long. I’ve got enough things to keep track of without meticulously noting down every book that I’d like to read, but won’t because the paperback’s not out yet.

One more thing, though admittedly it’s no so much related as it just happens to be a particular obsession of mine: Why not consider changing how hardcovers are done? I remember back when I was in school, our required reading materials were often mass-market sized hardcover versions. You hardly ever see those things in a bookstore, though. I’d be much more willing to buy something like that than their larger cousins, especially if they were around the same price as a trade paperback.

Link via Bookslut

| January 23rd, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Books & Literature | Trackback | No Comments »



Site Feeds

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives:

By Category

By Date


Search This Site


RSS Posts at Snappy Patter

RSS Links of Interest

Arts & Entertainment

Books & Literature

Comic Strips

General Interest

Money & Commerce

Politics & Philosophy

Science & Technology

Meta