Sloganeering.Org
home | archive | about | site policies | contact us | s.o store

Archive for August, 2009

Belated Patter

Monday, August 31st, 2009

I’ve got to remember to do these things in a timely fashion. Here’s the round-up of the last week at Snappy Patter.

| August 31st, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Blog Rondo | Tags: | Trackback | No Comments »



Stochastic Friday Stuff

Friday, August 28th, 2009

Yesterday, Choire at The Awl posted a video of a Sleater-Kinney performance under a rather dubious justification. We say you don’t need a reason to post a Sleater-Kinney video.



Also, if you’re interested: Kristin Hersh has posted this month’s new, free song to the CASH Music site. The essay about the song can be found here.

| August 28th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Miscellaneous, Video | Trackback | No Comments »



Patton Oswalt Wants You To Have Children

Thursday, August 27th, 2009

Yes, fucking do LSD and go wander Barcelona. But also, why not get married and have kids? Because that’s a whole other crazy fucking experience.

- Patton Oswalt, 8/2009

Patton Oswalt, like many Americans, is married and has a child. This otherwise ordinary turn of events is actually something of a big deal. We’re talking about a man who used to refer to babies as bags of crap.  It is safe to say that something fundamental about Oswalt has changed. And, maybe, he thinks you might want to change, too.

It would be easy to take a swipe at him for completely turning around on this issue — but frankly, I’m not interested in trying to give him shit for it. People change their minds, sometimes. It happens. Actually, I’m happy for Patton Oswalt.

I appreciate that he’s not being a jerk about the awesomeness of parenthood, even if his weakly formulated nudge at the child-free to get married and have a baby already rankles a bit. Okay, you rich, straight guy, thanks for the advice! It’s a little like someone in a game of hide-and-go-seek standing at the base, shouting, “Man, being safe is totally awesome! All you hidden people out there should try it!”

But enough about him, for now. We can burn his name into the surface of the moon, later. In the meantime, let’s broaden our focus, a little bit. If you’re ready for some long-ass rambling, follow me past the jump.

(more…)

| August 27th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Miscellaneous, Psychology | Tags: , , | Trackback | 3 Comments »



Make Nice

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

The problem I have with books like Harry Potter is the same as the problem I have with movies like The Rescuers. In Potter, a benevolent giant shows up out of nowhere to pluck poor Harry from his life of misery and abuse; The Rescuers is the tale of a kidnapped orphan who gets rescued by a couple of mice. I think both of those stories send a bad message to children. Don’t be silly, kids: life is a prison and you’ll spend it pretty much all of it being miserable, and no one – absolutely no one – cares enough about you to ever swoop down out of nowhere to save you.

I’m not the only one concerned with the potential effects that children’s literature might be having on their tiny little brains. Former children’s laureate Anne Fine, for example, takes issue with modern children’s books. She thinks that they are too real. Where’s the hope? she asks. Where are the happy endings? I mean, she’s wrong in that she takes up an opposite position to mine, but at least she is concerned.

Of course, there’s been plenty of backlash against Fine’s assertions already. Realism – gritty, bloody realism – is required if children’s literature is to have any chance of connecting with the violent, sex-crazed, perpetually drunk and drug-addled youth that is today’s typical British pre-teen. After all, shouldn’t children who habitually stab people be allowed access to a book about some a big crybaby, who can’t handle the sheer joy of stabbing others?

And really, children are well equipped to deal with the fact that life is a pointless struggle against horror and trauma that will never, ever get better. Don’t they already have to get up and deal with it every day, just like the rest of us? What child, given that situation, wouldn’t love to read books about characters who share their circumstances, which inevitably destroy them by the end of the last chapter? The answer is none. Just as we know that people are inherently evil, we also know that kids are born literary mandarins, who easily recognize the lightweight unworthiness of happy endings as the sure sign of escapist trash.

If anything, what children’s literature really needs is even more realism. Why not a gripping, ripped-from-the-headlines story about mythical creatures going around cornholing their relatives? And, while it’s widely recognized as one of the great young adult novels, the shocking truth is that Justine is hardly ever included in any nation’s elementary school curriculum.

Proof that happy, life-affirming literature is not something that children should be exposed to can be seen in the hugely narcissistic generations we’ve managed to raise up since the 1980′s. These little bastards have grown from sheltered snowflakes into adults who want universal suffrage, social justice, and free healthcare for sick babies, instead of what they should be doing – like hoarding ammunition and learning how to create really realistic looking birth certificates.

Escapist children’s literature, the kind that Anne Fine wants to force upon us with her “hope panels”, is exactly the kind of resolve-weakening poison we don’t need. How are we going to teach our kids to deal with the gore-clogged meat-grinder that is life, if we keep giving them opportunities to temporarily escape from the unrelenting pressures of their miserable existences? The only time children should be allowed a break from being forced to read The Road, is when we force them to play violent videogames on huge, high-resolution televisions. (I know there’s a chance that repeatedly simulating the act of shooting another human being in the face might turn kids into marshmallows, but this is only a problem if you dole out such rewards too frequently. Still, a little fun every now and again should be allowed.)

It’s time for we adults to at long last send a message to our children: Life’s a shit sandwich, kids. Have a bite.

Oh, and brush your teeth.

| August 26th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Books & Literature, Satire | Tags: | Trackback | No Comments »



Fandom Makes Us… Mad?

Monday, August 24th, 2009

In a post over a Jezebel on angry Twilight fans who are getting vocal about all the criticism their favorite book/movies series has been getting, we spotted this paragraph:

At first, I felt a little guilty about slapping a “sparkly vampire” tag to several Twilight related pieces, but after thinking about it for a while, I realized that this outrage over having an opinion that is anything but positive re: Twilight is the real problem with Twilight fans (or Twihards, or Twilighters, or what have you.) Make a Harry Potter joke, and HP fans will giggle. Say something stupid about Gandalf, and LOTR fans will laugh. Star Trek and Star Wars fans have been the butt of jokes (many of them created lovingly by hardcore fans) for years, but maintain a sense of humor about their fandom.

Hmm… there may be some things to address, here.

Trouble In Paradise: Fans Don’t All Have A Sense Of Humor

I have to wonder just how true that last quoted sentence is. As a veteran of many a convention and newsgroup discussion where these fandoms are concerned, I’ve seen plenty of humorless, po-faced saddoes nearly come to blows over the most esoteric, fannish bullshit imaginable.

This is especially true on the Web (except for the fear of winding up in a physical altercation). For a long time, the Internet was synonymous in my mind with epic flame-filled rage-fests that did nothing but shatter fandoms into bitter warring factions. (I was around during the first outbreak of the Joel vs. Mike wars – it was traumatizing.)

The fandom I’ve been involved with most deeply is the one surrounding Doctor Who. This is the fandom that created such humorous works as The Completely Useless Encyclopedia. But it also created the utterly humorless Television Companion. There is a factionalism in fandom between those who think it’s okay to laugh at what they love, versus those who see any such behavior as evidence that one is not really a fan. If you laugh at it, you could never understand the deep, abiding affection that real fans feel. Worse, you are aligning yourself with those heartless pricks who think it’s cool to make fun of someone’s hobby.

Young Fandoms vs. Old Fandoms: Cults vs. Religions

Comparing Twilight’s fandom to those of Star Wars, Star Trek, and Lord of the Rings is not quite fair. The latter examples are mature fandoms – each of them has been around for more than 25 years. (Even Harry Potter, the youngest fandom mentioned in the quoted section, has been around for twelve years now.) They’ve had time to develop stable relationships between the jokers and the saddoes, yes, but more importantly, these communities have grown into established traditions. Nobody’s going to get that bent out of shape if somebody makes fun of a bunch of sexless Trekkies, because they’ve proven that such fun-making can’t hurt the fandom: It has become indestructible.

Meanwhile, Twilight’s only been around since 2005. There’s still that nagging doubt in the minds of the fan base that, at some point, everyone might realize how silly they’re being and the whole thing could disintegrate overnight. Therefore, deep down, many fans sense that fragility, and they are out to defend the community they’ve established.

As time goes on, and if the Twilight fandom continues to exist, it’s very likely that we’ll see Twilight fans cracking jokes at their own expense, eventually. This is the natural result of the self-confidence spawned by a community’s continued existence.

We Can Say It; You Can’t

One of the ways to defend that community is to fight back against fun-making outsiders, whose derision might pressure some less dedicated fans into abandoning the fandom. This kind of thing becomes less of a concern as time goes own, if a fandom can stay strong for long enough.

Of course, where Twilight fans are concerned, they’ll still probably get upset over the wisecracks of outsiders for quite a while yet. Inter-group teasing is miles different than attacks from outsiders. It just doesn’t feel safe – it feels mean-spirited, judgmental, and shaming. And, yeah, people get defensive about stuff like that.

Here’s To The Future

For myself, I don’t care a bit whether or not Twilight’s fandom continues to exist, and I would never suggest that people don’t have a right to criticize it just because a few feelings might get hurt. But really, it will be interesting to see what happens ten or twenty years from now – when the fandom is more mature.

| August 24th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Entertainment, Fandom | Tags: | Trackback | No Comments »



Site Feeds

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives:

By Category

By Date


Search This Site


RSS Posts at Snappy Patter

RSS Links of Interest

Arts & Entertainment

Books & Literature

Comic Strips

General Interest

Money & Commerce

Politics & Philosophy

Science & Technology

Meta