Sloganeering.Org
home | archive | about | site policies | contact us | s.o store

Archive for the ‘Art’ Category

The Toolshed is Bare

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Back in junior high and high school, I ended up in a few art classes. Not that I paid much attention. They required only a minimal effort to just barely pass, and that’s all I brought to the table. I just didn’t care.

But there’s a few ways not to care about things like that. Some kids were offended that their brilliant artistic skills were being ignored by the teacher, who of course had a duty to educate all the people in the room, rather than simply lavishing attention on those who were the most talented (those whose parents were convinced they were, anyway). Then there were the kids who were convinced that it was all bullshit, a dodge or a game. This blank canvas is a statement, you know? It’s art — how can you say I did it wrong?

I was one of those who simply couldn’t believe that any of this stuff had much to do with me. I had decided that I certainly wasn’t any kind of artist, and therefore had no real need to retain anything the teacher said after the semester ended. I just wasn’t a creative person. Lacking ideas, I let the mechanics of art slip through my fingers because I thought I would never need them.

I even took a creative writing class (laugh if you want to — I did). Sure, why not? I was doing all right in my English class, why not get an easy mark in what, I figured, would basically be another one. I was reading for fun almost all the time, but the thought of being a writer was horrifying to me. Creating  coherent written material was something I found grueling, at best. I liked school essays and papers, though, because my teachers presented us with a strict set of rules about how to do them. Topic sentence, supporting sentence, reword your sources until you met the page/paragraph minimum, and then wrap it all up and be done with it.

Things got really easy once I learned how to type.

I regret all of that not paying attention, now. It didn’t occur to me, as time went on, that I would change. Over time, a couple of developments occurred that made me reconsider my failure to work at developing any sort of artistic skill.

I admit, it was mostly hormonal. Most teenagers have trouble dealing with the newfound intensity of their emotions, and I was no different. Searching for an outlet, I started taking guitar lessons, and spent most of my weekly sessions talking about my life with my instructor, who was kind enough to realize that, really, I needed a sympathetic ear more than a musical mentor. (I imagine how difficult it must be to be a guitar teacher, when you have to do double duty as some kid’s therapist.)

The lessons lasted about a year, but everyone involved kind of realized that they were going nowhere. I plateaued pretty early on, and I wasn’t doing the work needed to improve. I got what I wanted from physically bashing away, but the subtleties of the instrument were beyond me. Also, the money ran out. I eventually grew up and learned to deal, mostly.

Later in life, two things happened to me that I did not expect.I began to experience the first of a series of sudden realizations that I was getting older, and that we all have a limited amount of time to work with. Everybody has those moments. Eighteen, twenty-five, thirty — you wake up in the night, thinking that time is running out. Some nights, when I misbehaved a little too badly, I was quite sure I was going to die, and had no accomplishments to point at to make myself feel a little better.

The other thing that happened to me was that I began to react to things more than I’d used to. I’d been listening to the news for years, but I had almost nobody I could to talk to about what was going on in the world. I had a lot I wanted to say, and these things stacked up. I felt like I had a pile of smoldering embers in my head that I needed to get out. So I started a website, so I could have a place to dump the stuff in my head.

I soon realized that I just didn’t have the skills necessary to make sense out of what I was thinking. I was grinding my brain into paste, just to produce some 500 words or so. I couldn’t organize my thoughts, and I couldn’t make the words line up in a sensible way. But I couldn’t stop. I kept at it for years. I’m still terrible at it, but at least it’s gotten easier. I’ve written more than a thousand posts, between my various ventures, and some of them are kind of all right. Maybe five or six of them.

The moral of the story is that I should have paid better attention to the mechanical aspects of the craft — any crafts, really. I had mistakenly assumed that artists are full of ideas, all of the time, which is not something that’s true for everybody. The problem was that I assumed I would never have an idea that I needed to express, so I never got good at using the tools. Eventually, when I started feeling a powerful urge to get to work, I went out to the shed to find what might have been alien artifacts, for all I knew about using them.

Well, now I know better. But I am old, and so, so tired. 

| January 25th, 2010 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Art | Trackback | No Comments »



Choose One: Love or Money

Monday, January 18th, 2010

A recent poll on the io9 website asked: Which Science-Fiction Book Series Do You Secretly Wish You Could Take Over? I have to admit, I was a little tickled by the idea. What fan hasn’t imagined getting that call? “BC–Larry Niven’s just decided to move to Hawaii to become a skin-diving instructor, and we need you to take over Known Space for him!” (“Well, I’m flattered!”) It’s a little like fantasizing  about what it would be like to get called up on stage to play with your favorite band.

On the other hand…

The io9 poll is coming from a place of very real disappointment. (Which is the inevitable response whenever Dune is mentioned, these days.) There is a very real sadness that comes with the knowledge that there will never again be another book from your favorite author or your favorite series. But that’s not what caused me to feel a distinct chill in my veins almost immediately after my initial delight.

It is possible (so I’ve been told) to love what you do for a living, if you’re lucky or clever enough. For many others, however, work is that thing miserable thing we are required do in between bouts of heavy drinking. And, for some people, there is an eventual realization that they’ve fallen into a trap: They find a job doing something that they used to love, only to find that love poisoned by the addition of professional responsibilities.

I’ve been professionally involved with the computers for over ten years now, and I’ve seen this happen to a lot of people. I’ve seen bright-eyed hobbyists wither and burn out as they slowly realize that working with machines is nowhere near as fun when caught between a business’s unreasonable demands on one side, and the inevitable organizational requirement to spend as few resources as possible, on the other. What do you do when your job is to make miracles happen, only to be rewarded with even more impossible missions?

I imagine this happens in other fields. I’ve certainly met plenty of graphic designers who wind up designing catalogs, who therefore spend the bulk of their days printing out posters for their bands on the large-format plotter, and trying to convince themselves not to take that flying leap off the roof garden.

Of course, I’ve read plenty of interviews or personal essays from writers who love their jobs, but I don’t know if that’s a common attitude in that profession. What I do know is this: As a fan, I derive enjoyment from reading my favorite series, and I doubt I would much care to have the responsibility for writing them. Leave aside the question of talent for a minute. Even if I had the ability to do well, taking over someone else’s franchise seems like a pretty thankless job.

Back in 2005, thousands of fans’ hearts turned a slight shade of green upon learning that Russell T Davies would be reviving Doctor Who. At that point, any one of us would have gladly switched places with him. Now? Probably not so much. He’s said that he still loves the show, but from the most recent episodes he’s written, I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that he’s a little burnt out on it. What supports this theory, in my mind at least, is how genuinely happy he seems when he says that he is looking forward to being able to watch the show again as a mere fan.

And that seems right, to me. Producing and writing a television show is hard work, and Who fans are notoriously bitchy on top of that. Even if Dune or Pern fanatics are more low-key, it’s impossible to avoid disappointing somebody. Worse, unlike fiction written purely for love (like fan fiction), you can’t simply drop it when you decide it’s not working, you can’t quit when it’s not fun anymore, and you spitefully (yet cathartically) kill a series that doesn’t actually belong to you.

If you write a story based on someone else’s work, they’ve got every right to tell you to knock it off–but, they can’t come in and demand fiddly little changes. Unless someone is paying you to write that story. And if other fans don’t dig your Captain Scotty of the USS Walter Mondale,  novel, well, to hell with them. Unless you’re doing publicity, and the nail you while your trying to market your book.

But imagining what it would be like to take the reins of an existing franchise is harmless enough, I suppose (even if we’d never enjoy the reality of such a task). In it’s own way, that’s part of the fun of reading books that take place in a well-defined, attractive, imaginary universe. That’s what most of us do anyway, in our own imaginations. We tell ourselves stories that the original writers didn’t write, and we do it secretly, in our own brains. Unless we write fanfic, which is as honest an expression of love as there is for a fan, and is also highly fraught with ethical questions and bad spelling.

Still, everyone loves a good story–whether they’re reading it, or writing it.

| January 18th, 2010 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Art, Books & Literature, Fandom | Tags: , | Trackback | No Comments »



What Am I Doing?

Friday, November 20th, 2009

Sometimes you kind of have to check in with yourself-to ask yourself if you are doing what you really think that you are. And then you know.

So, now I am quite sure I am watching My Dinner With Andre on YouTube. Sorry, but I’m not feeling well.

| November 20th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Art, Humor, The Internet Will Shame You | Trackback | No Comments »



Tubular

Saturday, April 18th, 2009

Another lazy Saturday afternoon spent watching YouTube. I know that since its demise as the worlds premier copyright infringement showcase (and the attendant corporate-sponsored dreck that’s sprung up as a result of this), YouTube has become very uncool to talk about, but I’m perpetually behind the times on these sorts of things. Anyway, some random observations:

- In a world where even the cheapest professionally produced TV show can afford a little CGI here and there, YouTube is one of the few places that we can all reconnect with a style of video production where things like chyrons are a huge technical achievement. Many videos are made with single camera setups and minimal post-production. What this means is that, even if we are now a society so well versed in the language of visual representation that we innately understand its rules, YouTube artists often have no choice but to break those conventions due these technical limitations. And, when you’ve watched as much television as I have, there can be a pleasurable frisson in watching something that doesn’t quite achieve that level of polish. You see the rapid zooms, the poor framing, the stumbles and flubs (no second takes, here) and soft or weak focusing, and it’s a little charming.

- Too much of that sort of thing can be annoying, however. I enjoy semi-pro video production in the same way I enjoy fanzines: I think their attempts to rise to a professional level make these videos… I don’t know, cute? I don’t want to just say “charming” again, but I suppose that’s the better term. Anyway, I’m predisposed to be a little affectionate about this kind of thing.

- Conversely, while some people might enjoy it, I can’t get into the jerky home movie handicam style of video. The wild panning, which results in nothing so much as a wash of psychedelic smears of color, the bad audio, the incomprehensible purposes behind these creations – it’s just not for me. Do a search for “I’m bored” on YouTube sometime (if you happen to be bored), and you’ll find some really unwatchable shit. But, it’s an aesthetic that might grab some people. At least they know where they can find it.

- Whilst looking for Joy Division covers (I’m a hopelessly nostalgic goon, I’m afraid) I stumbled across a video by a 15 year old kid who does these amazing note-for-note recreations of songs from some of my favorite bands. (At least, when I was a teenager, they were.) This inspired a certain amount of joy ("Hurray! Maybe kids today don’t universally have terrible taste in music!”), but also a corresponding amount of pain (“Boo! This kid is a freaking musical prodigy with a home studio, who can play every rock instrument that exists, while I’m an fat old bastard who takes twenty minutes to work his way through an eight-note scale, and hasn’t ever played a barre chord without completely farking it up!) Then I remembered how I’m not supposed to look upon the successes of other people as opportunities to beat myself up, but it didn’t help much. Still, good for ya’, wunderkind.

- I can’t claim that my viewing of an official music video from some random band is likely to make me run over to the music store to pick up their CD, but I can still make a case for bands and record companies to allow their videos to be posted. Google let’s one find music by simply typing in a lyric or two of a song whose title and artist has completely slipped my mind; but YouTube allows me to confirm almost instantly whether or not the song in question is the one I’m after. These special, earworm types of songs are the ones I’m most likely to buy off iTunes. So, people, please post your songs (with lyrics, if applicable) so I can send a buck or two your way, huh?

| April 18th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Art, Music, Pop Culture, Science & Technology | Tags: | Trackback | No Comments »



No Matter How Small

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

I’ve been following the Morning News’ Tournament of Books this year, and I’ve got to say the main thing I’ve taken away from it is a wicked temptation to read Robert Bolaño’s 2666. There’s the controversy, of course – is it great or is it terrible? Also, it’s a translated book, it’s South American, and of course I want to read more of that sort of thing, but, there’s something else: I find large books very tempting.

I like a book where an author can stretch out, allowing him or her to play with the language without having to worry about getting anywhere quickly. One of my favorite series is Neal Stephenson’s Baroque Cycle, which comes to around 3,000 pages over three volumes. If you look at the story being told in that series, it could lose about a thousand pages or more without seriously impacting the plot, but I would sorely miss the digressions, the asides, and the somewhat meandering explorations of coinage, commerce, stock markets, and insurance. It creates a sense of place that you could move your whole imagination into for a while.

On the other hand, I’m really trying to read shorter books this year, because I feel I’m missing out on something. There’s a great deal of pleasure in reading a book that must accomplish its aims with great economy. And, stylistically, a short book must make its words count since its got so few of them to spend.

I’m not sure how I got sucked into the idea that a great book needs to be a lengthy one as well. To Kill a Mockingbird, The Great Gatsby, and The Dubliners are all fairly short, for example, but they stand up. It may be that I am, I confess, more of a consumer than I am a lover of literature. In deciding which of two books to purchase, I often abandon any thought over which book might be better or worse, and instead,  focus on the value-for-money aspect of the decision, at least in terms of raw page numbers. “Well, $15.99 for Pnin, or $7.99 for Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell… hmm.”

Am I a philistine, then? Unquestionably. This is no proud declaration of ignorance, mind, but rather a resigned confession; I may be too old to change my ways, or to develop sophisticated tastes. Anyway, I’d rather be fun at parties – even if they’re the wrong sorts of parties. Still, I am concerned that I’ve put aside too many worthwhile books for no better reason than the fact that they seemed too expensive by weight. Even with my debased preferences, I realize that one shouldn’t buy books the way one buys meat. Besides, I get most of my books from the library anyway.

So, any recommendations for small books?

| March 24th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Art, Books & Literature | Tags: , , | Trackback | No Comments »



Site Feeds

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives:

By Category

By Date


Search This Site


RSS Posts at Snappy Patter

RSS Links of Interest

Arts & Entertainment

Books & Literature

Comic Strips

General Interest

Money & Commerce

Politics & Philosophy

Science & Technology

Meta