Sloganeering.Org
home | archive | about | site policies | contact us | s.o store

Archive for the ‘Religion’ Category

The Unbearable Blightness of Blogging

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

Often – far too often – I’ll start thinking of a blog post, only to watch it disappear into a swirl of futility. Normally these feelings of pointlessness emerge from the realization that I’ve stumbled into a well-worn groove, already cut deep into the earth by other, more original thinkers. I feel a certain amount of guilt over this: It is our nature as human beings to regurgitate, repeat, and recapitulate. If we are lucky we add infinitesimally to the peregrinations of our predecessors. But even repetition has its place as a tool of reinforcement, or as a reminder of our common history of thought.

There is another level of futility that often keeps me from writing: My own insignificance in the face of an ancient, implacable universe. That modern life requires – hell, insists upon – a certain degree of solipsism, is widely (if quietly) acknowledged by most first-world residents. My occasional inability to nurture a delusion of self-importance whilst typing up some jive for a limited audience is a failure of character that I’m loathe to admit. But I am a defective human being, and I might as well acknowledge it.

I do try to snap myself out of the dumps when they strike. Not by ginning up some higher purpose of existence, or by convincing myself that I have anything to contribute to the great tribe of Humanity; rather, the old reliable funk-buster that I cling to is fashionability. The futility of human endeavor? Existential dread? It’s been done to death. As one of my nieces might say, “How emo.”

How wonderful it is that the dour mien of the nihilist is lately considered a deliberate fashion choice. The idea that those who bear the outward signs of their constant meditations on meaninglessness are merely affecting a philosophical garment is one I find incredibly heartening. It wonderfully implies that dread and nausea are simply choices of no more moment than one’s hairstyle or pinky-ring selection.

The practical upshot here is that I don’t have to believe in the meaningless randomness of the material world, based simply on the evidence of my senses. I could wake up tomorrow and choose to embrace things like American Idol or Jason Mraz, and find within the same significance and meaning that some find in religion or economic theory. And why not? Why shouldn’t I make that choice?

But it’s enough for me to know that it’s an option, just one of many. The freedom to choose to inhabit a universe of angel figurines and ethical vegetarianism is a tonic that heals as it sits unopened in the medicine cabinet. I could decide to abandon my anxiety towards the cruel universal will sometime between lunch and the afternoon meeting if I wanted to, and that makes the cruelty somewhat easier to bear, I think.

The problem with thinking in this way is that one might become so soused on choice that one might accidentally write a self-help book that says, in short, that wishing does indeed make it so. There’s a fiduciary appeal in that, but surely the guilt that comes with taking money from desperate people who’ll still feel like shit afterward must be tortuous beyond belief.

| July 28th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Psychology, Religion | Trackback | No Comments »



Realization Nation

Thursday, March 12th, 2009

One of the most difficult bits of existence for human beings to communicate are epiphanies. In general, it can be pretty tough to explain any experience, but the sudden realization of truth is just that little bit tougher.

It’s no mystery why that should be, really. Epiphanies often come upon a person in a peculiar fashion, where in the space of a moment they completely understand that something or other is absolutely true, without necessarily having any evidence to back it up. It can be a violent, disorienting, side-swipe of emotion. These are things that can not be summed up in words, though many try.

When I was a youngster, I was taken to a motivational seminar. The nice lady who was giving the talk was doing pretty well, if failing somewhat to really convince the teenagers in the audience that their actions would have long term consequences; at least she was fun to listen to, not judgementmental or fear-mongering or anything like that. But, in the midst of describing a near-death experience that changed her life, she paused, and then parenthetically let us know that her next sentence would probably be most important thing that anyone would ever tell us, ever. Which was this:

Everything is everything else.

And then, silence. While she let that sink in to our young minds. While, actually, what we were doing was looking at our neighbors and subtly shrugging our shoulders. We didn’t laugh, didn’t dander up, or do anything more. We, as an audience, shared a collective “Oh…..kay?” That was all. And then the speaker finished her story.

Afterward, after several hours, I heard a lot of people having a laugh over the phrase “everything is everything else”, which didn’t seem fair. It was obviously a big deal to the speaker, a defining point in her existence. Of course we didn’t understand her personal experiences. But to laugh at them seemed cruel. (I didn’t realize, at the time, that laughter is a way to warn people that they’re drifting out of social normalcy.)

Then again, I was busy wending my own way out of fundamentalism, and I was becoming unwilling to denigrate other people’s fantastic experiences. As one who’d believed that I had been, once or twice, nudged lightly by God myself, I knew that if one of us were risible, so the both of us would be.

Which is not to say that I got it, of course. I was just as bemused as my cohorts by the speaker’s Important Sentence.

In a way, it’s the same sort of thing that allows one person to be deeply moved by a piece of music or a painting or a poem that his or her friends think is ridiculous, or at least merely boring. (For example, there are a lot of closet ABBA fans out there.) Beyond art and entertainment, even; it’s possible to feel this way about people, as well. How many times have there been folks whose two best friends can’t stand each other?

It is probably a mistake, then, to share an epiphany. We live in times that are passionately unsympathetic. Not only are you not allowed to complain, or flaunt your undeserved affluence; it would be unwise to attempt to explain your sudden understanding of universal truth.

That’s how it goes, I’m afraid. Because, unfortunately, without all the emotional folderol that accompanies an epiphany, all you’ve got is words, and epiphanies always sound trite when reduced down to that. It doesn’t help that, often, these things get turned into pithy catch-phrases like those you could find in any money-grubbing self-help manual. Unless you’re willing to freak out your victims with drugs, psychedelic music, and a skillfully wielded vibrator, don’t expect their mental states to match your own.

On the other hand, some people are quite good at finding those who might be willing to listen to the life-shaking stories of their own epiphanic experiences. We still have cults, don’t we?

| March 12th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Bunk, Psychology, Religion | Tags: , , | | No Comments »



Death, Taxes, and Chicken Wings

Sunday, February 1st, 2009

There’s some football stuff going on today. We’ll come back to that in a minute.

It will interest absolutely no one to learn the following bit of information: I did my taxes yesterday. Well, actually I had them done for me because, as regular readers already know, I’m broke — but I am broke in a series of complex and financially tangled ways. Also, I am terrible at math, to the point that I’m unable to quantify even the simplest elements of my life. So, it’s worth it to me to pay somebody to figure all this stuff out; quite frankly, if left in a room with a tax form an my own devices, in the end I’d wind up having to pay something like the national debt, and inadvertently signing up to join the Coast Guard, to boot.

But the really irritating thing is how, every year, my tax guy always says the same thing whilst poring over my ever-anemic W-2 form: "We’ll, let’s see how you’ve done this year." It’s bad enough that my tacky possessions make it quite clear just how on-the-ropes I am, financially; I don’t need him judging me, as well. And, I can’t really tell him that it bugs me when he says that, lest he should accidentally fail to mention some massively obscure deduction, or else surreptitiously tick the little box that says "Mark For Death" or something.

I mean, I get that taxes are necessary and all that, and I’m far too old to continue to indulge in the massive conspiracy-theory fantasy game wherein I imagine that we’d all be quite happy living a Mad Max-style anarchist utopia anyway. But the great anxiety comes from seeing in raw, black and white numbers, just how badly it is that I’m doing. Also, I don’t like it when my tax guy laughs as he types my numbers into his spreadsheets. That seems pointlessly cruel.

But today is Super Bowl Sunday, where all financial concerns are set aside for a moment, while we consider more import topics; like how much those Super Bowl ads cost. Or how much we’re all supposed to be spending on pizza, chicken wings, and beer. It’s a news-media tradition, these things.

There’s another thing that happens, year after year: the seemingly casual statements that deem Super Bowl Sunday a holiday. Oh-ho, that’s clever. I’ve been seeing it all over the place. Someone on TV even said that the Super Bowl is the 2nd biggest food-holiday, after Thanksgiving. But, as much as this sort of twee, elbow-nudge commentary annoys me, I’ve been thinking about it, and though I hate to admit it, they might actually, possibly, have a point.

It’s not that football is a religion (which it is), and that the Super Bowl is its high-holy day (which it is) — neither of these things necessarily qualify a given celebration as a true blue holiday in this country. There is something else that your average putative holiday must be, if it really wants to make into red ink on the calendar: It must be widely seen as an opportunity for retailers to shake us down.

Yeah, okay, things like Arbor Day, Columbus Day, and Flag Day are all real holidays, but most people don’t really care about them. That’s because, unless you’re buying a tree, a spaghetti dinner, or a brand new flag to hang from the pole on your pick-up truck, they require no extra expense on the part of the average consumer.

Not like Christmas, with its gifts and eggnog; nor Thanksgiving with its turkey and liquor; nor like Independence Day, with its fireworks and beer; nor like Valentine’s Day, with its flowers and wine; nor like New Year’s, with its champagne and taxi rides; nor even like Halloween, with its razor blades and condoms.

But you look at that list and think, well, put that way, of course the Super Bowl is a holiday. Capital expenditure is the name of the game, here. Walk into any supermarket in the two weeks leading up to the big game, and you’re likely to be slapped in the face with the same kind of gaudy come-ons you haven’t seen since Santa Claus was briefly getting more exposure than those kids on the OC. I’d say that retailers are desperate, but that might be understating the case; I think they’d run you over with an NFL-branded steamroller, if they didn’t think it’d damage your credit cards too badly to be used.

Well, legitimate holiday or not, I’ve had enough. Now, this might have something to do with the fact that, normally, I’m not usually cold-cocked by my tax preparer until well after the Super Bowl has come and gone; coming face to face with my perilous monetary situation right before the big day, on the other hand, has left me unwilling to participate in any kind of boozy, wing-soaked blow-out, especially the ones where they expect guests to bring something.

| February 1st, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Money & Commerce, Pop Culture, Religion | Tags: , , | Trackback | No Comments »



Just Say It

Tuesday, December 9th, 2008

Ah, December. This is a magical time of year, and the signs are everywhere, if you know what to look for: The trees coming down from the deep-woods, selling themeselves by the side of the highway; the look of slowly dawning madness emerging in the eyes of retail employees forced to spend hours and hours listening to an endless loop of holiday songs; the realization that giftcards are basically just less useful versions of their cash equivalents.

But what I like best about this time of year are the memories of seasons past. The return of the holiday season, like the blooming of the wheat or summer block-buster releases, reminds us all that life is about endlessly repeating cycles. At least until the sun blows up.

That doesn’t mean that things don’t change. For instance, I remember, back when I was a child, that the words “Merry Christmas” were unencumbered any kind of social relevance. For more than thirty years, people have been saying “Merry Christmas” to me — that hasn’t changed. The frequency with which I am the target of this greeting hasn’t changed either.

What has changed is the delivery. Once uttered with the ringing lightness of a porcelain bell, it now comes at me through clenched teeth; as if it were the final insult about my mother that precedes a fist-fight. What once was a meaningless social lubricant has become (in the minds of some folks) a grim provocation, the speaker visibly bracing him- or herself to repel the deranged outbursts of the dogmatic crypto-pagan that he or she might be facing.

So, thank you, Bill O’Reilly, for convincing your fans that “Merry Christmas” is an illegal phrase, something that’s gone from being a half-hearted, obligatory, meaningless greeting, to become an act of civil disobedience to speak. The thing is, people never stopped saying it — major corporations, acting in their own capitalist, financial self-interests stopped saying it. But eff the free-market, I guess.

I actually don’t mind people saying Merry Christmas to me; but I’m starting to get irritated by all the clench-buttocked strangers tossing it in my face as though the expect me to throw down. “Merry Christmas” used to mean, “Hello, it’s December.” Now, people are saying like it means, “Hey, fuck you, pinko.”

| December 9th, 2008 | by BCSilvia | Categories: History, Religion | Tags: | Trackback | No Comments »



Kid Stuff

Wednesday, November 19th, 2008

So, this. From this.

The first link is to an article that’s subtitled, "A report from the chaotic postfeminist dating scene, where only the strong survive." Which should give you an idea of what it’s about. Now, perhaps it’s the jaded mien of a man nearing his dotage talking, but really, these kinds of essays are getting so bloody tedious, and the linkbait is losing its flavor. Still…

Jeff over at Alas, a Blog, and Megan at Jezebel have already responded far more adroitly than I ever could to the original article‘s cavalcade of troglodytes, most of whom crept out of the woodwork in response to an earlier article’s assertion that many men are in a state of "prolonged adolescence", and that they are "child-men".

The fact that these guys so angry about their failures in dating is irritating. I don’t think "men" are baffled and bitter about all of this — I think that the specific men who got quoted as responding are, though. Thing is, their attitudes baffle me right back. They seem so invested in a mentality that’s so old fashioned, so outmoded, it’s like watching some guy arrive in modern-day Rome in a time-machine, and then get pissed off when nobody can tell him where the slave-market is.

I mean, I know they think that their railing against a "certain type" of woman, but in fact the source of their anger is their own expectations and bad judgement. Really, I suppose I can’t get too offended at the "child-man" piece because the guys she was describing were the same over-grown fratboys that I have never been close to. Tough break, fellas, but what do you expect? You can’t just slag off an entire gender, and then be lauded as rational, well-adjusted individuals, you know.

But that earlier article bothered me too, for different reasons than the jerks quoted in its sequel (hopefully). I suppose the real sticking point for me was this sentence: "For whatever reason, adolescence appears to be the young man’s default state, proving what anthropologists have discovered in cultures everywhere: it is marriage and children that turn boys into men."

If you’re going to make a blanket statement like that, then you’re actually making two rather broad judgements there; you’re also implying that it’s not a default state for women. Which is true — for some women. And, also false — for some women. The same might be said for men, but no, not in this article. Oh well.

But that "marriage and children turns boys into men" thing… that bothers me. (They used to say the same thing about war, too.) You can’t grow up if you don’t get married and have kids? You can’t be responsible and mature? Without a spouse and a brood, you can’t be taken seriously? I shouldn’t be surprise by this attitude, though: The idea that a person can be joyfully alone seems beyond imagining for some people.

In high school, guys without girlfriends are losers, and the stereotype of the sexless nerd sets in. Girls are pressured to have boyfriends, but not too many, and they should have sex with them except that absolutely not, no just go sit on that block of ice over there and eat your graham crackers. Unmarried women are treated as poor, unfortunate souls who must be just devastated that they haven’t gotten the ring, yet. Unmarried men are childish, commitment-phobes who refuse to grow up. And it just keeps going on like that, a kaleidoscope of inducements, peer-pressure, pejorative labels, the momentum of tradition, threats to one’s status — push, push, push.

This is what has always bothered me about relationships. It’s never just you and your partner who get into one: It’s always you, your partner, and society. And that’s not a three-way I’m comfortable with. For all the progress that we pat ourselves on the back for, the idea of a life without romantic relationships is still punished with the implication that the uncommitted will not be allowed to grow up.

And if so many people see marriage and parenthood as the trophies of adulthood — and if that adulthood is treated as the most exalted, elite level of human development, or the ultimate prize that one receives for following all of the rules — then one can’t help but wonder if those attitudes are a core influence behind the burning desire to deny gay people the right to possess those symbols. (Aside from religious zeal and childish body-horror.) Because, of course, it is useful to infantilize people you don’t like. Because you’re the adult here, and you’re the one who knows what’s best. And you can just dismiss ‘em, dumb kids. They don’t live in the grown-up real world, like you do.

But, if it all seems confusing and frustrating, cheer up. We’ve got a little bit more leeway in deciding for ourselves what being an adult is, and what are lives are for. Yes, it’s scary, and yes, there’s still a lot of pressure being put on us to stick to the script — but future generations will sort it all out, someday. I mean, by the time the world has to figure out whether or not Robosexuals should be allowed to get married, human-on-human relationships should be a snap.

| November 19th, 2008 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Gender, Miscellaneous, Psychology, Religion | Trackback | 1 Comment »



Site Feeds

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives:

By Category

By Date


Search This Site


RSS Posts at Snappy Patter

RSS Links of Interest

Arts & Entertainment

Books & Literature

Comic Strips

General Interest

Money & Commerce

Politics & Philosophy

Science & Technology

Meta