Sloganeering.Org
home | archive | about | site policies | contact us | s.o store

Archive for the ‘Satire’ Category

Scenes From a Panel Discussion

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

Inspired by a weekend spent watching CSPAN’s Book TV.

Moderator: And now we’d like to take some questions from the audience.

Questioner: [Unintelligible]

Moderator: Please speak into the microphone.

Questioner: Yes, thank you. I just wanted to comment? I think that the professor’s statements about early twentieth century American industrial production are really interesting, but what I wanted to point out that wasn’t addressed is how the Soviet collectivization of farming really… you know, impacted the manufacture of traditional Russian cheeses, which in turn, uh, has a lot to do with the kinds of realignment of—or, rather the eventual realignment of—I mean, how that led to the disastrous invasion of Afghanistan, which is something we’re dealing with now, and how that affected the trade policy of the rest of the West, as with, you know, uh, the turmoil of Western Europe in the late 70’s, and… and what I really feel is the whole… [makes a vague hand-gesture] crux of why Soviet competition was just so, so crucial to the Apollo missions, and—not that it justifies the purges or anything, but you know it was so, so crucial—and, anyway, I mean, I’m a sociology professor at Belmont Community College, and the thing I see repeated over and over again throughout history, is just how important the median presence is to a developing sense of the class-based dialog and just the whole tenor of mass media communications, which is just, I think, as far as it makes sense to me to point out that, if we ignore these factors there’s really a vital facet of the discussion that we’re missing, you know?

Moderator: I’m sorry, I don’t quite understand your question.

Questioner: I guess what I’m saying is, why wasn’t I on the panel?

Moderator: I’d like to thank you all for coming here tonight, but I’m afraid we’re out of time.

| December 10th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Satire | Tags: | Trackback | No Comments »



Make Nice

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

The problem I have with books like Harry Potter is the same as the problem I have with movies like The Rescuers. In Potter, a benevolent giant shows up out of nowhere to pluck poor Harry from his life of misery and abuse; The Rescuers is the tale of a kidnapped orphan who gets rescued by a couple of mice. I think both of those stories send a bad message to children. Don’t be silly, kids: life is a prison and you’ll spend it pretty much all of it being miserable, and no one – absolutely no one – cares enough about you to ever swoop down out of nowhere to save you.

I’m not the only one concerned with the potential effects that children’s literature might be having on their tiny little brains. Former children’s laureate Anne Fine, for example, takes issue with modern children’s books. She thinks that they are too real. Where’s the hope? she asks. Where are the happy endings? I mean, she’s wrong in that she takes up an opposite position to mine, but at least she is concerned.

Of course, there’s been plenty of backlash against Fine’s assertions already. Realism – gritty, bloody realism – is required if children’s literature is to have any chance of connecting with the violent, sex-crazed, perpetually drunk and drug-addled youth that is today’s typical British pre-teen. After all, shouldn’t children who habitually stab people be allowed access to a book about some a big crybaby, who can’t handle the sheer joy of stabbing others?

And really, children are well equipped to deal with the fact that life is a pointless struggle against horror and trauma that will never, ever get better. Don’t they already have to get up and deal with it every day, just like the rest of us? What child, given that situation, wouldn’t love to read books about characters who share their circumstances, which inevitably destroy them by the end of the last chapter? The answer is none. Just as we know that people are inherently evil, we also know that kids are born literary mandarins, who easily recognize the lightweight unworthiness of happy endings as the sure sign of escapist trash.

If anything, what children’s literature really needs is even more realism. Why not a gripping, ripped-from-the-headlines story about mythical creatures going around cornholing their relatives? And, while it’s widely recognized as one of the great young adult novels, the shocking truth is that Justine is hardly ever included in any nation’s elementary school curriculum.

Proof that happy, life-affirming literature is not something that children should be exposed to can be seen in the hugely narcissistic generations we’ve managed to raise up since the 1980′s. These little bastards have grown from sheltered snowflakes into adults who want universal suffrage, social justice, and free healthcare for sick babies, instead of what they should be doing – like hoarding ammunition and learning how to create really realistic looking birth certificates.

Escapist children’s literature, the kind that Anne Fine wants to force upon us with her “hope panels”, is exactly the kind of resolve-weakening poison we don’t need. How are we going to teach our kids to deal with the gore-clogged meat-grinder that is life, if we keep giving them opportunities to temporarily escape from the unrelenting pressures of their miserable existences? The only time children should be allowed a break from being forced to read The Road, is when we force them to play violent videogames on huge, high-resolution televisions. (I know there’s a chance that repeatedly simulating the act of shooting another human being in the face might turn kids into marshmallows, but this is only a problem if you dole out such rewards too frequently. Still, a little fun every now and again should be allowed.)

It’s time for we adults to at long last send a message to our children: Life’s a shit sandwich, kids. Have a bite.

Oh, and brush your teeth.

| August 26th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Books & Literature, Satire | Tags: | Trackback | No Comments »



Positive Creep?

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

The negativity has gotten way out of hand. I’m not talking about negative people, or negative thoughts, or Internet forums, or any of the practical crystallizations of downbeat attitudes, but rather the abstract concept of negativity itself. And, by out of hand, I’m referring to the most basic meaning of the phrase: That is, when it comes to the abstract concept of negativity, I think we’ve lost control of it.

It is foolish to hope that the speakers of any language will someday huddle up in the middle and actually come to some kind of consensus on the precise definitions and usages of certain words, the dictionary section of the bookstore notwithstanding. But the idea of negativity is such a vexed question that, well it’s really difficult to maintain one’s optimism in the face of it. Still, here is a brief taxonomy of how some people deal with negativity.

The Secretly Sad

Some live in mortal fear of negativity. They cannot admit the existence of a problem without appending, often desperately, some uplifting verbal u-turn at the end. “I’ve lost my house, and I’m living in my car – but at least I got away from my annoying neighbors, ha-ha!” they say, with a wild look in their eyes. It’s kind of like riding one of those waterslides that goes down, down, for hundreds of feet, and then pops you up in the air for second before you finally hit still water. The bump at the end in this case indicates: “Please don’t be alienated, I’m still fun to be with!”

This fear of being perceived as a negative person stems from the fear that one might drive away human companionship. Because, when a person’s social connections are tenuous, they might feel a certain amount of pressure to justify other people’s relationships with them. They want their presence in other people’s lives to be constantly paying off. But this too can get annoying. It’s a little like how, during the rise of pinball machines, manufacturers kept artificially inflating the scoring levels of the games in attempt to attract players with arbitrarily greater measures of value. “Huh, you’re still talking to me, even though I’ve vaguely intimated that I have tremendous, devastating personal problems that I minimize with jokes – you get A MILLION BILLION POINTS!”

It’s a behavior that, when left unchecked, can turn into its own annoying psychological tic. Some things are just bad, and it’s good to recognize those things, but also some things are just annoying, unchangeable, and result in venting. Someone over-compensating in an attempt to avoid being seen as some kind of Debbie Downer who’s not worth spending time with, can often be just as excruciating, because they can’t shut it off, and they interfere with a really good, healthy whinge. Sometimes other people will want to commiserate or bitch about things, without being made to confront the fact that they’re being petulant. This is normal first world behavior and it may be ugly, but in small doses it’s harmless. However, introduce someone who refuses to let go of the bright-side of everything, and the fun stops as any possible catharsis that might have emerged goes off to hang itself with a licorice rope.

The Attitude Cop

Of course, those who fear being seen as negative have at least one very good reason for feeling that way. Because another way to fear negativity is to believe that any person who emanates the slightest whiff of pessimism is dangerous and untrustworthy. So, somebody mutters frustratedly  under under their breath – maybe he or she’s a good person who’s having a bad day? Nope! That muttering is evidence of an undesirable personality. To those who fear negativity in this way, there are people – and then there are foul, blobby excrescences of life-destroying negative energy, coated with thin veneers of optimism, which the slightest stress will scratch away, revealing the trap. The fearful believe that their precious, precious energy will be sucked right out of them, if they associate too closely with the blobby negativists.

Often the fearful are in tenuous positions, perhaps charged with enforcing nonsensical policies on behalf of powerful authority figures. Or, they might mistakenly perceive a robust system of rules and procedures as a complex gossamer web, held together by hope and rainbows and unicorns, whose very existence could be threatened by the merest expression of doubt or contempt. You can’t fly unless you believe that you can! The problem arises when this sort of fearful individual begins to see reason and good sense as a threat to the system – which might have existed long before they arrived, and will probably survive long after they depart, but there you are.

The Jerk

This is not to say that negativity should always be cherished in a person, if it means an automatic dismissal of any new idea or suggestion. Anyone who immediately gainsays everything is a prick. Nobody should have to tolerate a prick – unless you happen to be related to them (and even that has its limits). The reflexively negative individual gets things wrong in exactly the opposite way from the Attitude Cop; where others see pessimism, the Prick sees a pinnacle of clear-headed thinking. Observers must take care, however, to distinguish negative creeps like this from the unsympathetic depressive, who tends to lash-out out of pain. (The “sympathetic depressive”, of course, is that model so often seen in Lifetime original movies, and is marked by crying, silence, lack of appetite, and other inwardly directed symptoms. They suffer more beautifully than their counterparts. Or at least they cause less trouble.)

The kind of negativist we’re talking about here cherishes their pessimism; they nurture it tenderly as they watch CNN or read their true-crime books. They bitterly defend it from any and all attacks of positivity. To eliminate the bright side of any issue, they’d gladly burn out the sun. Perversely, being a downer makes them happy. But they also defend their own negativity from the negativity of others, for it is vitally important to them that they be the most pessimistic, and therefore, the clearest-minded and most rational of all.

The Desperate Blogger

At last we’ve reached the worst of the worst. Instead of digging deep and working hard to generate edifying, entertaining, or informative material, the Desperate Blogger will instead wind himself up in over-written, pointless essays that clearly reveal that he is the worst offender of any specious categorization scheme he can commit to a website. The ferocious judgementalism on display is generally in direct proportion to the depth of the inadequacies he somehow fails to perceive in himself. Why, there’s this one guy who – wait, hang on a second…

| May 13th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Miscellaneous, Psychology, Satire | Tags: , | Trackback | No Comments »



Snap Judgement: Headlines: Investment Advice Edition

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

Teens compete with laid-off adults for summer jobs: Sample job interview question: Have you ever heard of OSHA? Adult: Sure. Teen: WTF? Advantage: Employer! Advice: Invest in Wal*Mart.

US Says Bank of America Needs $33.9 Billion Cushion: A 33.9 billion-dollar cushion? I think they have those at Bed Bath & Beyond. They’re okay, I guess. But they’re not as good as those buckwheat hull pillows, which incidentally are the loudest pillows on Earth! Advice: Invest in gold and handguns. And toilet paper. You’ll miss it when it’s gone.

Chrysler Wins Approval for Auction With Fiat as Lead Bidder: Imagine driving a car with all the stylish luxury of Fiat, with the reliability of a Chrysler. I’m getting chills! But it’s probably the carbon monoxide poisoning. Advice: Invest in Huffy bicycles, possibly huffy environmentalists.

Governor says he’s open to debate on legal pot: As the ranks of the unemployed continues to swell, the nation begins to look at relaxing marijuana laws. COINCIDENCE? Advice: Buy Frito-Lay and Visine. Also: The people who fix lampposts that have been hit by cars.

Justice Likely to Urge No Prosecutions: Hypocrisy-watch begins now: The first torture memo-writing lawyer to receive sanctions who complains at all about the harshness of the punishment will earn a free pop in his pouty, buttery mouth. He’ll never actually collect it of course, but he will definitely deserve it. Advice: Invest in companies that manufacture ball-gags and strappado equipment.

Cox’s SEC Hindered Probes, Slowed Cases, Shrank Fines, GAO Says: It only sounds like Christopher Cox might be in a lot of trouble for being so transparently bad at his job, but when you do the conversion from poor man’s trouble to rich man’s trouble, he’ll probably get off with being the target of a stern editorial in Tool & Die Manufacturing Digest. Remember when the obscenely wealthy used to off each other in duels all the time? Whatever happened with that? Advice: Buy: Hot Pockets. Do not buy: Lean Pockets. The lack of calories will dampen your rage.

10 iPhone Apps for Foodies: All right, we get it. You have money. May you drop your iPhone in a toilet. Advice: Apples. Not Apple. Because apples are delicious, and relatively affordable.

Frank to offer legislation allowing online gambling: We have been known to take a risk online, occasionally. Sometimes, you lose your shirt, and sometimes you win, but mostly you wind up out of money with nothing to show for it. That’s the way the cookie crumbles when you shop on eBay. Advice: Notice how I didn’t go for the online dating joke? I hope you invested in class recently, because that shit just paid off!

| May 6th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: News, Satire, Snap Judgement | Trackback | No Comments »



Uber-Wilder und Verruckter Mensch

Sunday, February 15th, 2009

dawnofsteve

Prologue:

There once was a funny-man named Steve Martin. That man might still be alive, might still exist as an organizing principle, but he has experienced a kind of death, in the Tarot-ian sense. An old phase of life has been shuffled off, and a new one has been taken up. Signs of this have been visible for years; but it wasn’t until our attention was brought to this article, that it struck us with its blinding obviousness.

Things have not been going well for Mr. Martin in the critical press. His latest film, The Pink Panther 2, has been roundly drubbed. His recent appearance on Saturday Night Live has been widely reviled. It would seem the inevitable slide of his career into the Sargasso Sea of painful, bleak irrelevance has, at last, taken place.

But, like an avenging angel, he turns aside the critics’ blades. Like a Phoenix, he rises with the smoke of his own immolation. Like Hulk Hogan, he shakes off the attacks of his rivals with only the powers of America, patriotic music, and his sweet 24-inch pythons.

Steve Martin has gone beyond good and bad reviews:

U.S. actor Steve Martin dismissed negative reviews of the latest installment of the Pink Panther movie franchise, saying comedies always had to overcome critical snobbery and that the genre was “not a critics’ medium.”

In this statement, the man that was once Steve Martin is revealed as something new in the world. He has broken the bonds of the moralist, and become something more than comedian. He defines the boundaries of criticism and genre. And it is true, because he says it is.

I. The Three Amigos & Metamorphoses:

The first Steve Martin encountered by the popular consciousness was as a fixture of the stage and television. Once enamored with his breathless delivery, spastic physical routines, ridiculous props, and banjo performances, the man with the “happy feet” and the arrow through his noggin’ was called funny. When the critics got hold of him, he became smart. Then, with packed arenas and sold-out performances fueling his transmigration, he became a Comedy God.

II. The Arrow-Through-The-Head of Virtue:

Surrounded by waves of laughter from his audiences, countless lackies and lickspittles, and, most likely, tons and tons of nubile ass, he was buried at all times in those who treated him with respect and modesty. They probably even used the word “genius” a lot. The highly affected, “I’m not so great. Oh, who am I kidding, yes, I’m great!” performances of his 80′s era Saturday Night Live appearances were probably not so affected after all. He was a man nursing a secret suspicion that he might possibly be the greatest thing to ever happen to comedy since God poured misanthropy and Benzedrine into a bad suit, and created Jerry Lewis.

III. Despisers of the Body of Work:

Let us not kid ourselves; critics are not always wise. Like all explorers of the higher truth, they can be outright dicks, sometimes. They are still important: The function of the critic of literature is to separate the wheat from the chaff, the worthy from the unworthy, and to explicate the virtues of a work in ways the author is unable or unsuited to do himself, beyond popular or personal taste. No author, however revered in the final analysis, is above the attention of the critic. Thank God comedians don’t have to put up with that shit, though.

IV. The Bite of the Asshole:

Still, the critics assail Steve Martin, because they think his recent output has been really terrible. An almost deliberately unfunny, stupid mess, really. Yanking them away from his neck, he says, “It’s just the way it is. And so you go, oh, well, okay, why are these movies that you’ve criticized so archly still around 10 years later, 15 years later, 20 years later. It’s because comedy is not a critics’ medium. It just isn’t.” An unkind observer might point out that the critics of 20 years ago are different than the ones that are criticizing now, and the movies they’re criticizing are different too, and Steve has changed over the intervening time period as well, so the two situations aren’t exactly comparable in any meaningful way—but why be unkind when one could say nothing, instead?

V. Voluntary Dreck:

Some sell-out too late. You can never sell-out too early! But there’s selling-out, and there’s ceasing to give a crap about the product you create. Though it might sound strange, it’s very important to stop caring at the right time.

The right time is when you realize you can get away with it. Now is the time for Steve Martin.

He’s made dozens of films. He’s wealthy beyond reasoning. He’s got John Belushi’s immortal soul sealed up in an empty jar of Vick’s Vap-o-rub. He’s got two eyes that function, two ears that can hear.

What he sees, and what he hears is this: Any piece of garbage, no matter how unfunny and short-lived it might be, will always be forgiven. He sees stars fall when they make mistakes off-screen, not on it. He’s seen celebrities flounder and become desperate when they mismanage their resources, not their artistic output. Steve Martin is temporally sound. His legacy is secure. No cadre of critics, even those so incensed as to burn him in effigy or defame his godawful performances, can ever chance these facts. Their petty morality simply does not apply to the superior creature that he has become. He’ll make the films that he wants to make without regard to their meager ethical concepts, because above all, Steve Martin has at last overcome himself. Sometimes, three or four times in one evening!

VI. The End of this Premise:

Martin does not strive after quality, or art. He doesn’t even refer to comedy as such, preferring instead to use the word “medium” to describe it. All he cares about is the work. Which, as long as he’s willing to perform what others might perceive as abasement, he will get plenty of that. But, does anyone believe that Martin’s path is the path to a higher existence? Does anyone think that what looks like total apathy and loss of judgment and critical faculties, might actually represent the Next Level?

“I know I do,” Martin answered, shortly before launching into a 1-1/2 minute banjo performance to loud applause.

Thus plucked Clouseauthustra.

| February 15th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Entertainment, Pop Culture, Satire | Tags: , , | Trackback | No Comments »



Site Feeds

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives:

By Category

By Date


Search This Site


RSS Posts at Snappy Patter

RSS Links of Interest

Arts & Entertainment

Books & Literature

Comic Strips

General Interest

Money & Commerce

Politics & Philosophy

Science & Technology

Meta