Sloganeering.Org
home | archive | about | site policies | contact us | s.o store

Posts Tagged ‘privacy’

Meta: The Past is Gone

Friday, March 13th, 2009

Well, not gone entirely. I’d better explain.

You may have heard about Google’s new interest-based advertising scheme, which has caused quite a lot of fuss. (Whenever data is collected about you it puts you at risk, regardless of whether or not such data is aggregated or “anonymized”. The risk might be made small by clever technologies, but it is never zero. Anyway; this is a topic for another time.)

Now, yesterday evening I received an email from Google AdSense, telling my that I would have to change my site’s privacy policies in order to reflect the new method of tracking people’s traffic. I know I don’t have any ads on the front page, but the thing is that I have a few AdSense modules on the old archive pages. That is, those pages that were written by hand back when this place was a webzine.

So deleted them. The archives, I mean.

They are still on my hard drive, of course. But rather than go through something like 200 individual HTML files to prize apart the content and the advertising in order to avoid having to change my privacy policy, I thought it would just be easier to remove the offending pages for the time being, until I get a chance to figure out how to re-integrate that content with the blog without messing with people’s privacy.

Incidentally, I’m not sure if this will do the trick, but Google does have a page that allows you to opt-out of their advertising cookies. But from the language, it might just be referring to the DoubleClick stuff, so I’m not sure if it applies to the new clickstream-watching stuff.

| March 13th, 2009 | by BCSilvia | Categories: Meta, Paranoia | Tags: , , | Trackback | No Comments »



YOU’RE JUST GOING TO HAVE TO TRUST US

Thursday, September 28th, 2006

From Wired News: A pending Senate bill, if passed, may move several lawsuits challenging the NSA’s warrentless surveillance to a secret court:

Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Arlen Specter’s National Security Surveillance Act would allow the attorney general to move surveillance cases involving state secrets to the little-known Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, which has only heard one case in its 28-year history.

National security experts and civil liberties advocates assail the idea, saying it would diminish the chance that the government’s controversial snooping would face open judicial scrutiny.

Naturally, there is some opposition:

Louis Fisher, an expert on national security law who just published a book on the state secrets privilege called In the Name of National Security, says that court is just too secret.

“We always do this in the public, and the courts have to come up with a decision that shows reasoning, facts and understanding, and to give that to a secret court where, I imagine, there will be secret briefs and secret oral arguments and a secret decision, maybe a declassified decision?” Fisher said. “I can’t see there’s credibility or trust in that kind of process. I frankly would prefer it to be decentralized and have a lot of district judges take a crack at it.”

Organizations that make decisions in secret have a pretty disturbing history; not many (that is, any) of them have ever owned up to abrogating citizens’ rights without either allowing a long stretch of time to pass, or a knock-down, drag-out fight.

Sleep tight, America.

| September 28th, 2006 | by BC | Categories: News, Paranoia | Tags: | Trackback | No Comments »



Site Feeds

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives:

By Category

By Date


Search This Site


RSS Posts at Snappy Patter

RSS Links of Interest

Arts & Entertainment

Books & Literature

Comic Strips

General Interest

Money & Commerce

Politics & Philosophy

Science & Technology

Meta